re PR tree-optimization/70586 (wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

PR tree-optimization/70586
	* tree-ssa-ifcombine.c (bb_no_side_effects_p): Return false
	for any calls.

	* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr70586.c: New test.

From-SVN: r234849
This commit is contained in:
Jakub Jelinek 2016-04-09 13:23:51 +02:00 committed by Jakub Jelinek
parent 0b77bbf392
commit f55460af16
4 changed files with 49 additions and 1 deletions

View file

@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
2016-04-09 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/70586
* tree-ssa-ifcombine.c (bb_no_side_effects_p): Return false
for any calls.
2016-04-08 Cesar Philippidis <cesar@codesourcery.com>
PR lto/70289

View file

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2016-04-09 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/70586
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr70586.c: New test.
2016-04-09 Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq@lps.ens.fr>
PR sanitizer/70573

View file

@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
/* PR tree-optimization/70586 */
int a, e, f;
short b, c, d;
int
foo (int x, int y)
{
return (y == 0 || (x && y == 1)) ? x : x % y;
}
static short
bar (void)
{
int i = foo (c, f);
f = foo (d, 2);
int g = foo (b, c);
int h = foo (g > 0, c);
c = (3 >= h ^ 7) <= foo (i, c);
if (foo (e, 1))
return a;
return 0;
}
int
main ()
{
bar ();
return 0;
}

View file

@ -125,7 +125,14 @@ bb_no_side_effects_p (basic_block bb)
if (gimple_has_side_effects (stmt)
|| gimple_uses_undefined_value_p (stmt)
|| gimple_could_trap_p (stmt)
|| gimple_vuse (stmt))
|| gimple_vuse (stmt)
/* const calls don't match any of the above, yet they could
still have some side-effects - they could contain
gimple_could_trap_p statements, like floating point
exceptions or integer division by zero. See PR70586.
FIXME: perhaps gimple_has_side_effects or gimple_could_trap_p
should handle this. */
|| is_gimple_call (stmt))
return false;
}