doc/implement-c.texi: About same-as-scalar-type volatile aggregate accesses, PR94600
We say very little about reads and writes to aggregate / compound objects, just scalar objects (i.e. assignments don't cause reads). Let's lets say something safe about aggregate objects, but only for those that are the same size as a scalar type. There's an equal-sounding section (Volatiles) in extend.texi, but this seems a more appropriate place, as specifying the behavior of a standard qualifier. gcc: 2020-12-04 Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com> Martin Sebor <msebor@redhat.com> PR middle-end/94600 * doc/implement-c.texi (Qualifiers implementation): Add blurb about access to the whole of a volatile aggregate object, only for same-size as a scalar object.
This commit is contained in:
parent
78c4a9fece
commit
eb79f4db49
1 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -576,6 +576,11 @@ are of scalar types, the expression is interpreted by GCC as a read of
|
|||
the volatile object; in the other cases, the expression is only evaluated
|
||||
for its side effects.
|
||||
|
||||
When an object of an aggregate type, with the same size and alignment as a
|
||||
scalar type @code{S}, is the subject of a volatile access by an assignment
|
||||
expression or an atomic function, the access to it is performed as if the
|
||||
object's declared type were @code{volatile S}.
|
||||
|
||||
@end itemize
|
||||
|
||||
@node Declarators implementation
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue