tree-optimization/112305 - SCEV cprop and conditional undefined overflow
The following adjusts final value replacement to also rewrite the replacement to defined overflow behavior if there's conditionally evaluated stmts (with possibly undefined overflow), not only when we "folded casts". The patch hooks into expression_expensive for this. PR tree-optimization/112305 * tree-scalar-evolution.h (expression_expensive): Adjust. * tree-scalar-evolution.cc (expression_expensive): Record when we see a COND_EXPR. (final_value_replacement_loop): When the replacement contains a COND_EXPR, rewrite it to defined overflow. * tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.cc (may_eliminate_iv): Adjust. * gcc.dg/torture/pr112305.c: New testcase.
This commit is contained in:
parent
1cf5dc05c6
commit
e3da1d7bb2
4 changed files with 56 additions and 26 deletions
18
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr112305.c
Normal file
18
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr112305.c
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
|||
/* { dg-do run } */
|
||||
/* { dg-require-effective-target int32plus } */
|
||||
|
||||
int a;
|
||||
void b()
|
||||
{
|
||||
long c = 3;
|
||||
unsigned int d = 50253292;
|
||||
int e = 2147483648;
|
||||
for (; a < 5; a++)
|
||||
do {
|
||||
e += 4;
|
||||
d -= c;
|
||||
} while (e < 20);
|
||||
if (d != -1560359471u)
|
||||
__builtin_abort ();
|
||||
}
|
||||
int main() { b(); }
|
|
@ -3353,11 +3353,13 @@ scev_finalize (void)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Returns true if the expression EXPR is considered to be too expensive
|
||||
for scev_const_prop. */
|
||||
for scev_const_prop. Sets *COND_OVERFLOW_P to true when the
|
||||
expression might contain a sub-expression that is subject to undefined
|
||||
overflow behavior and conditionally evaluated. */
|
||||
|
||||
static bool
|
||||
expression_expensive_p (tree expr, hash_map<tree, uint64_t> &cache,
|
||||
uint64_t &cost)
|
||||
expression_expensive_p (tree expr, bool *cond_overflow_p,
|
||||
hash_map<tree, uint64_t> &cache, uint64_t &cost)
|
||||
{
|
||||
enum tree_code code;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3444,7 +3446,7 @@ bitcount_call:
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
FOR_EACH_CALL_EXPR_ARG (arg, iter, expr)
|
||||
if (expression_expensive_p (arg, cache, op_cost))
|
||||
if (expression_expensive_p (arg, cond_overflow_p, cache, op_cost))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
*cache.get (expr) += op_cost;
|
||||
cost += op_cost + 1;
|
||||
|
@ -3453,7 +3455,8 @@ bitcount_call:
|
|||
|
||||
if (code == COND_EXPR)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (expression_expensive_p (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0), cache, op_cost)
|
||||
if (expression_expensive_p (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0), cond_overflow_p,
|
||||
cache, op_cost)
|
||||
|| (EXPR_P (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1))
|
||||
&& EXPR_P (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 2)))
|
||||
/* If either branch has side effects or could trap. */
|
||||
|
@ -3461,11 +3464,13 @@ bitcount_call:
|
|||
|| generic_expr_could_trap_p (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1))
|
||||
|| TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0))
|
||||
|| generic_expr_could_trap_p (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0))
|
||||
|| expression_expensive_p (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1),
|
||||
|| expression_expensive_p (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1), cond_overflow_p,
|
||||
cache, op_cost)
|
||||
|| expression_expensive_p (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 2),
|
||||
|| expression_expensive_p (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 2), cond_overflow_p,
|
||||
cache, op_cost))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
/* Conservatively assume there's overflow for now. */
|
||||
*cond_overflow_p = true;
|
||||
*cache.get (expr) += op_cost;
|
||||
cost += op_cost + 1;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
@ -3475,12 +3480,14 @@ bitcount_call:
|
|||
{
|
||||
case tcc_binary:
|
||||
case tcc_comparison:
|
||||
if (expression_expensive_p (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1), cache, op_cost))
|
||||
if (expression_expensive_p (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1), cond_overflow_p,
|
||||
cache, op_cost))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Fallthru. */
|
||||
case tcc_unary:
|
||||
if (expression_expensive_p (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0), cache, op_cost))
|
||||
if (expression_expensive_p (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0), cond_overflow_p,
|
||||
cache, op_cost))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
*cache.get (expr) += op_cost;
|
||||
cost += op_cost + 1;
|
||||
|
@ -3492,11 +3499,12 @@ bitcount_call:
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool
|
||||
expression_expensive_p (tree expr)
|
||||
expression_expensive_p (tree expr, bool *cond_overflow_p)
|
||||
{
|
||||
hash_map<tree, uint64_t> cache;
|
||||
uint64_t expanded_size = 0;
|
||||
return (expression_expensive_p (expr, cache, expanded_size)
|
||||
*cond_overflow_p = false;
|
||||
return (expression_expensive_p (expr, cond_overflow_p, cache, expanded_size)
|
||||
|| expanded_size > cache.elements ());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3796,6 +3804,7 @@ final_value_replacement_loop (class loop *loop)
|
|||
niter_num)))
|
||||
def = bit_def;
|
||||
|
||||
bool cond_overflow_p;
|
||||
if (!tree_does_not_contain_chrecs (def)
|
||||
|| chrec_contains_symbols_defined_in_loop (def, ex_loop->num)
|
||||
/* Moving the computation from the loop may prolong life range
|
||||
|
@ -3809,7 +3818,7 @@ final_value_replacement_loop (class loop *loop)
|
|||
|
||||
he probably knows that n is not large, and does not want it
|
||||
to be turned into n %= 45. */
|
||||
|| expression_expensive_p (def))
|
||||
|| expression_expensive_p (def, &cond_overflow_p))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -3834,15 +3843,23 @@ final_value_replacement_loop (class loop *loop)
|
|||
def = unshare_expr (def);
|
||||
remove_phi_node (&psi, false);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Create the replacement statements. */
|
||||
gimple_seq stmts;
|
||||
def = force_gimple_operand (def, &stmts, false, NULL_TREE);
|
||||
gassign *ass = gimple_build_assign (rslt, def);
|
||||
gimple_set_location (ass,
|
||||
gimple_phi_arg_location (phi, exit->dest_idx));
|
||||
gimple_seq_add_stmt (&stmts, ass);
|
||||
|
||||
/* If def's type has undefined overflow and there were folded
|
||||
casts, rewrite all stmts added for def into arithmetics
|
||||
with defined overflow behavior. */
|
||||
if (folded_casts && ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (def))
|
||||
&& TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (TREE_TYPE (def)))
|
||||
if ((folded_casts
|
||||
&& ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (def))
|
||||
&& TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (TREE_TYPE (def)))
|
||||
|| cond_overflow_p)
|
||||
{
|
||||
gimple_seq stmts;
|
||||
gimple_stmt_iterator gsi2;
|
||||
def = force_gimple_operand (def, &stmts, true, NULL_TREE);
|
||||
gsi2 = gsi_start (stmts);
|
||||
while (!gsi_end_p (gsi2))
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -3861,17 +3878,11 @@ final_value_replacement_loop (class loop *loop)
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
def = force_gimple_operand_gsi (&gsi, def, false, NULL_TREE,
|
||||
true, GSI_SAME_STMT);
|
||||
|
||||
gassign *ass = gimple_build_assign (rslt, def);
|
||||
gimple_set_location (ass,
|
||||
gimple_phi_arg_location (phi, exit->dest_idx));
|
||||
gsi_insert_before (&gsi, ass, GSI_SAME_STMT);
|
||||
gsi_insert_seq_before (&gsi, stmts, GSI_SAME_STMT);
|
||||
if (dump_file)
|
||||
{
|
||||
fprintf (dump_file, "\n final stmt:\n ");
|
||||
print_gimple_stmt (dump_file, ass, 0);
|
||||
print_gimple_stmt (dump_file, SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (rslt), 0);
|
||||
fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ extern tree resolve_mixers (class loop *, tree, bool *);
|
|||
extern void gather_stats_on_scev_database (void);
|
||||
extern bool final_value_replacement_loop (class loop *);
|
||||
extern unsigned int scev_const_prop (void);
|
||||
extern bool expression_expensive_p (tree);
|
||||
extern bool expression_expensive_p (tree, bool *);
|
||||
extern bool simple_iv_with_niters (class loop *, class loop *, tree,
|
||||
struct affine_iv *, tree *, bool);
|
||||
extern bool simple_iv (class loop *, class loop *, tree, struct affine_iv *,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -5527,7 +5527,8 @@ may_eliminate_iv (struct ivopts_data *data,
|
|||
|
||||
/* It is unlikely that computing the number of iterations using division
|
||||
would be more profitable than keeping the original induction variable. */
|
||||
if (expression_expensive_p (*bound))
|
||||
bool cond_overflow_p;
|
||||
if (expression_expensive_p (*bound, &cond_overflow_p))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Sometimes, it is possible to handle the situation that the number of
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue