Iterating cprop_hardreg... Third time's a charm.

This middle-end patch proposes the "hard register constant propagation"
pass be performed up to three times on each basic block (up from the
current two times) if the second pass successfully made changes.

The motivation for three passes is to handle the "swap idiom" (i.e.
t = x; x = y; y = t;" sequences) that get generated by register allocation
(reload).

Consider the x86_64 test case for __int128 addition recently discussed
on gcc-patches.  With that proposed patch, the input to the cprop_hardreg
pass looks like:

	movq	%rdi, %r8
	movq	%rsi, %rdi
	movq	%r8, %rsi
        movq    %rdx, %rax
        movq    %rcx, %rdx
        addq    %rsi %rax
        adcq    %rdi, %rdx
        ret

where the first three instructions effectively swap %rsi and %rdi.

On the first pass of cprop_hardreg, we notice that the third insn,
%rsi := %r8, is redundant and can eliminated/propagated to produce:

        movq    %rdi, %r8
        movq    %rsi, %rdi
        movq    %rdx, %rax
        movq    %rcx, %rdx
        addq    %r8 %rax
        adcq    %rdi, %rdx
        ret

Because a successful propagation was found, cprop_hardreg then runs
a second pass/sweep on affected basic blocks (using worklist), and
on this second pass notices that the second instruction, %rdi := %rsi,
may now be propagated (%rsi was killed in the before the first transform),
and after a second pass, we now end up with:

        movq    %rdi, %r8
        movq    %rdx, %rax
        movq    %rcx, %rdx
        addq    %r8, %rax
        adcq    %rsi, %rdx
        ret

which is the current behaviour on mainline.  However, a third and final
pass would now notice that the first insn, "%r8 := %rdi" is also now
eliminable, and a third iteration would produce optimal code:

        movq    %rdx, %rax
        movq    %rcx, %rdx
        addq    %rdi, %rax
        adcq    %rsi, %rdx
        ret

The patch below creates two worklists, and alternates between them on
sucessive passes, populating NEXT with the basic block id's of blocks
that were updated during the current pass over the CURR worklist.
It should be noted that this a regression fix; GCC 4.8 generated
optimal code with two moves (whereas GCC 12 required 5 moves, up
from GCC 11's 4 moves).

2022-06-25  Roger Sayle  <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
	    Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>

gcc/ChangeLog
	* regcprop.cc (pass_cprop_hardreg::execute): Perform a third
	iteration over each basic block that was updated by the second
	iteration.
This commit is contained in:
Roger Sayle 2022-06-25 09:35:45 +01:00
parent 476ef855d0
commit defa8537af

View file

@ -1383,7 +1383,9 @@ pass_cprop_hardreg::execute (function *fun)
auto_sbitmap visited (last_basic_block_for_fn (fun));
bitmap_clear (visited);
auto_vec<int> worklist;
auto_vec<int> worklist1, worklist2;
auto_vec<int> *curr = &worklist1;
auto_vec<int> *next = &worklist2;
bool any_debug_changes = false;
/* We need accurate notes. Earlier passes such as if-conversion may
@ -1404,7 +1406,7 @@ pass_cprop_hardreg::execute (function *fun)
FOR_EACH_BB_FN (bb, fun)
{
if (cprop_hardreg_bb (bb, all_vd, visited))
worklist.safe_push (bb->index);
curr->safe_push (bb->index);
if (all_vd[bb->index].n_debug_insn_changes)
any_debug_changes = true;
}
@ -1416,16 +1418,22 @@ pass_cprop_hardreg::execute (function *fun)
if (MAY_HAVE_DEBUG_BIND_INSNS && any_debug_changes)
cprop_hardreg_debug (fun, all_vd);
/* Second pass if we've changed anything, only for the bbs where we have
changed anything though. */
if (!worklist.is_empty ())
/* Repeat pass up to PASSES times, but only processing basic blocks
that have changed on the previous iteration. CURR points to the
current worklist, and each iteration populates the NEXT worklist,
swapping pointers after each cycle. */
unsigned int passes = optimize > 1 ? 3 : 2;
for (unsigned int pass = 2; pass <= passes && !curr->is_empty (); pass++)
{
any_debug_changes = false;
bitmap_clear (visited);
for (int index : worklist)
next->truncate (0);
for (int index : *curr)
{
bb = BASIC_BLOCK_FOR_FN (fun, index);
cprop_hardreg_bb (bb, all_vd, visited);
if (cprop_hardreg_bb (bb, all_vd, visited))
next->safe_push (bb->index);
if (all_vd[bb->index].n_debug_insn_changes)
any_debug_changes = true;
}
@ -1433,6 +1441,7 @@ pass_cprop_hardreg::execute (function *fun)
df_analyze ();
if (MAY_HAVE_DEBUG_BIND_INSNS && any_debug_changes)
cprop_hardreg_debug (fun, all_vd);
std::swap (curr, next);
}
free (all_vd);