From cce62625025380c2ea2a220deb10f8f355f83abf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 17:26:57 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] c++: fix ICE in joust_maybe_elide_copy [PR106675]

joust_maybe_elide_copy checks that the last conversion in the ICS for
the first argument is ck_ref_bind, which is reasonable, because we've
checked that we're dealing with a copy/move constructor.  But it can
also happen that we couldn't figure out which conversion function is
better to convert the argument, as in this testcase: joust couldn't
decide if we should go with

  operator foo &()

or

  operator foo const &()

so we get a ck_ambig, which then upsets joust_maybe_elide_copy.  Since
a ck_ambig can validly occur, I think we should just return early, as
in the patch below.

	PR c++/106675

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* call.cc (joust_maybe_elide_copy): Return false for ck_ambig.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/cpp0x/overload-conv-5.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/call.cc                               |  2 ++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/overload-conv-5.C | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/overload-conv-5.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.cc b/gcc/cp/call.cc
index a349d8e79db..048b2b052f8 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/call.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/call.cc
@@ -12542,6 +12542,8 @@ joust_maybe_elide_copy (z_candidate *&cand)
   if (!DECL_COPY_CONSTRUCTOR_P (fn) && !DECL_MOVE_CONSTRUCTOR_P (fn))
     return false;
   conversion *conv = cand->convs[0];
+  if (conv->kind == ck_ambig)
+    return false;
   gcc_checking_assert (conv->kind == ck_ref_bind);
   conv = next_conversion (conv);
   if (conv->kind == ck_user && !TYPE_REF_P (conv->type))
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/overload-conv-5.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/overload-conv-5.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b1e7766e42b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/overload-conv-5.C
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// PR c++/106675
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct foo {
+    int n_;
+    foo(int n) : n_(n) {}
+};
+
+struct bar {
+    int n_;
+
+    operator foo() const {
+        return foo(n_);
+    }
+    operator foo &() { return *reinterpret_cast<foo *>(n_); }
+    operator foo const &() = delete;
+
+    void crashgcc() {
+        foo tmp(*this); // { dg-error "ambiguous" }
+    }
+};