From a8eabe747536302adff780a868a185d081c77c3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Franke Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 01:36:46 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] re PR fortran/34532 (Doc error or rej.valid vendor extension: Integer as logical in IF expressions) 2007-12-25 Daniel Franke PR fortran/34532 * gfortran.texi: Fixed section about implicit conversion of logical and integer variables. From-SVN: r131180 --- gcc/fortran/ChangeLog | 6 ++++++ gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi | 13 +++++++++---- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog b/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog index 3e16f9bd5a8..57574cee239 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2007-12-26 Daniel Franke + + PR fortran/34532 + * gfortran.texi: Fixed section about implicit conversion of + logical and integer variables. + 2007-12-25 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/34514 diff --git a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi b/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi index 43e3d3a1ff6..6e9cb62b3d1 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi +++ b/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi @@ -1165,12 +1165,17 @@ zero, and @code{.TRUE.} is interpreted as one. When converting from @code{.FALSE.} and any nonzero value is interpreted as @code{.TRUE.}. @smallexample - INTEGER :: i = 1 - IF (i) PRINT *, 'True' + LOGICAL :: l + l = 1 +@end smallexample +@smallexample + INTEGER :: i + i = .TRUE. @end smallexample -However, there is no implicit conversion of @code{LOGICAL} and -@code{INTEGER} values performed during I/O operations. +However, there is no implicit conversion of @code{INTEGER} values in +@code{if}-statements, nor of @code{LOGICAL} or @code{INTEGER} values +in I/O operations. @node Hollerith constants support @section Hollerith constants support