diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/instantiate5-main.cc b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/instantiate5-main.cc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..be64bdbc4c2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/instantiate5-main.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+// this file is part of testcase instantiate5.C
+
+int main() {}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/instantiate5.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/instantiate5.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a2812cf6931
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/instantiate5.C
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// Build don't run:
+
+// Additional sources: instantiate5.cc instantiate5-main.cc
+
+// excess errors test - XFAIL *-*-*
+
+// `global constructors' are given the same name, based on foo(), on
+// both translation units, which is wrong, because it must be possible
+// to define template functions in multiple translation units, as long
+// as they're given the same definition
+
+// simplified from test case submitted by Daniel X. Pape <dpape@canis.uiuc.edu>
+
+template <class T> void foo() { }
+inline int bar() { foo<void>(); return 1; }
+static int i = bar();
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/instantiate5.cc b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/instantiate5.cc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fc86e0f8309
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/instantiate5.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// this file is part of testcase instantiate5.C
+
+template <class T> void foo() { }
+inline int bar() { foo<void>(); return 1; }
+static int i = bar();