From a48e7d361610afc2161fc3403e6711810200f2b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Mitchell Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 19:04:36 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] simd-5.c: Correct SPARC XFAIL indications. * gcc.c-torture/compile/simd-5.c: Correct SPARC XFAIL indications. Remove spurious PowerPC-64 XFAIL indications. From-SVN: r68033 --- gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/simd-5.c | 12 ++++++------ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index ed61bcf8dd9..778351adf9c 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2003-06-16 Mark Mitchell + + * gcc.c-torture/compile/simd-5.c: Correct SPARC XFAIL indications. + Remove spurious PowerPC-64 XFAIL indications. + 2003-06-16 Roger Sayle * gcc.dg/i386-387-5.c: New test case. diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/simd-5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/simd-5.c index 35b511879c3..15748069c05 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/simd-5.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/simd-5.c @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ +/* On SPARC64/SPARC-V9 it fails, except with -m32. On regular SPARC + it doesn't fail, except with -m64. In other words, this test fails + on 64-bit SPARC. Unfortunately, there's no way to encode that + information in the dg framework, so the test will XPASS on 32-bit + SPARC. */ /* h8300 does not have long long */ -/* PowerPC-64 doesn't handle this; see PR target/9680 */ -/* { dg-do assemble { xfail h8300-*-* powerpc64-*-* } } */ -/* On SPARC64/SPARC-V9 it fails, except with -m32. */ -/* { dg-xfail-if "PR target/9200" { "sparc64-*-*" "sparcv9-*-*" } { "*" } { "-m32" } } */ -/* On regular SPARC it doesn't fail, except with -m64. */ -/* { dg-xfail-if "PR target/9200" { "sparc*-*-*" } { "-m64" } { "" } } */ +/* { dg-excess-errors "PR target/9200" { xfail "sparc*-*-*" "h8300-*-*" } } */ #define vector64 __attribute__((vector_size(8)))