From 9d4ad8570c3bab2e145aa7b39ce8c66bafbf1945 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Biener Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:30:56 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] testsuite/97494 - amend gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c As reported in the PR all powerpc64 targets fail FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 because like on arm we now vectorize 4 opportunities. This adjusts the testcase to follow the arm example. 2021-03-11 Richard Biener PR testsuite/97494 * gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c: Adjust for powerpc64*-*-*. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c index 117d65c5ddb..bf8f434dd50 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ int main (void) Not all vect_perm targets support that, and it's a bit too specific to have its own effective-target selector, so we just test targets directly. */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 4 "vect" { target { aarch64*-*-* arm*-*-* } } } } */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 "vect" { target { vect_strided4 && { ! { aarch64*-*-* arm*-*-* } } } } } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 4 "vect" { target { aarch64*-*-* arm*-*-* powerpc64*-*-* } } } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 "vect" { target { vect_strided4 && { ! { aarch64*-*-* arm*-*-* powerpc64*-*-* } } } } } } */ /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 0 "vect" { target { ! { vect_strided4 } } } } } */