RA: Constrain class of pic offset table pseudo to general regs
On some targets an integer pseudo can be assigned to a FP reg. For pic offset table pseudo it means we will reload the pseudo in this case and, as a consequence, memory containing the pseudo might be recognized as wrong one. The patch fix this problem. PR target/109541 gcc/ChangeLog: * ira-costs.cc: (find_costs_and_classes): Constrain classes of pic offset table pseudo to a general reg subset. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/sparc/pr109541.c: New.
This commit is contained in:
parent
b747f54a2a
commit
8cc8707446
2 changed files with 33 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -2016,6 +2016,16 @@ find_costs_and_classes (FILE *dump_file)
|
|||
ira_assert (regno_aclass[i] != NO_REGS
|
||||
&& ira_reg_allocno_class_p[regno_aclass[i]]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (pic_offset_table_rtx != NULL
|
||||
&& i == (int) REGNO (pic_offset_table_rtx))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* For some targets, integer pseudos can be assigned to fp
|
||||
regs. As we don't want reload pic offset table pseudo, we
|
||||
should avoid using non-integer regs. */
|
||||
regno_aclass[i]
|
||||
= ira_reg_class_intersect[regno_aclass[i]][GENERAL_REGS];
|
||||
alt_class = ira_reg_class_intersect[alt_class][GENERAL_REGS];
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ((new_class
|
||||
= (reg_class) (targetm.ira_change_pseudo_allocno_class
|
||||
(i, regno_aclass[i], best))) != regno_aclass[i])
|
||||
|
|
23
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/pr109541.c
Normal file
23
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/pr109541.c
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
|||
/* { dg-do compile } */
|
||||
/* { dg-options "-O1 -mcpu=niagara4 -fpic -w" } */
|
||||
|
||||
int rhash_sha512_process_block_A, rhash_sha512_process_block_i,
|
||||
rhash_sha512_process_block_block, rhash_sha512_process_block_W_0;
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned rhash_sha512_process_block_W_2;
|
||||
|
||||
void rhash_sha512_process_block (void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned C, E, F, G, H, W_0, W_4, W_9, W_5, W_3, T1;
|
||||
|
||||
for (; rhash_sha512_process_block_i; rhash_sha512_process_block_i += 6) {
|
||||
T1 = F + (rhash_sha512_process_block_W_2 += 6);
|
||||
rhash_sha512_process_block_A += H & G + (W_5 += rhash_sha512_process_block_W_0);
|
||||
H = C & T1 & E ^ F + (W_9 += rhash_sha512_process_block_W_0);
|
||||
G = T1 ^ 6 + (W_0 += rhash_sha512_process_block_block);
|
||||
F = (unsigned) &G;
|
||||
T1 = (unsigned) (&T1 + (W_3 += rhash_sha512_process_block_block > 9 > W_4));
|
||||
C = (unsigned) (T1 + &E);
|
||||
W_4 += W_5 += rhash_sha512_process_block_W_0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue