re PR java/2040 (java.util.Hashtable(int,float) is stricter than sun's version)

Fix for PR java/2040:
	* java/util/HashMap.java (HashMap): Don't throw exception for
	loadFactor > 1. Add exception messages.
	* java/util/Hashtable.java (Hashtable): Likewise.

From-SVN: r39969
This commit is contained in:
Bryce McKinlay 2001-02-22 04:16:07 +00:00 committed by Bryce McKinlay
parent 7a6f729041
commit 810e8b5200
3 changed files with 22 additions and 20 deletions

View file

@ -64,8 +64,6 @@ import java.io.ObjectOutputStream;
* @author Jon Zeppieri
* @author Warren Levy
* @author Bryce McKinlay
* @version $Revision: 1.9 $
* @modified $Id: Hashtable.java,v 1.9 2000/12/17 09:15:51 bryce Exp $
*/
public class Hashtable extends Dictionary
implements Map, Cloneable, Serializable
@ -171,15 +169,17 @@ public class Hashtable extends Dictionary
* @param loadFactor the load factor
*
* @throws IllegalArgumentException if (initialCapacity < 0) ||
* (initialLoadFactor > 1.0) ||
* (initialLoadFactor <= 0.0)
*/
public Hashtable(int initialCapacity, float loadFactor)
throws IllegalArgumentException
{
if (initialCapacity < 0 || loadFactor <= 0 || loadFactor > 1)
throw new IllegalArgumentException();
if (initialCapacity < 0)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Illegal Initial Capacity: "
+ initialCapacity);
if (loadFactor <= 0)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Illegal Load Factor: " + loadFactor);
buckets = new Entry[initialCapacity];
this.loadFactor = loadFactor;
this.threshold = (int) (initialCapacity * loadFactor);
@ -721,8 +721,6 @@ public class Hashtable extends Dictionary
* as per the Javasoft spec.
*
* @author Jon Zeppieri
* @version $Revision: 1.9 $
* @modified $Id: Hashtable.java,v 1.9 2000/12/17 09:15:51 bryce Exp $
*/
class HashIterator implements Iterator
{
@ -818,16 +816,15 @@ public class Hashtable extends Dictionary
* elements; this implementation is parameterized to provide access either
* to the keys or to the values in the Hashtable.
*
* <b>NOTE: Enumeration is not safe if new elements are put in the table as
* this could cause a rehash and we'd completely lose our place. Even
* <b>NOTE</b>: Enumeration is not safe if new elements are put in the table
* as this could cause a rehash and we'd completely lose our place. Even
* without a rehash, it is undetermined if a new element added would
* appear in the enumeration. The spec says nothing about this, but
* the "Java Class Libraries" book infers that modifications to the
* hashtable during enumeration causes indeterminate results. Don't do it!
*
* @author Jon Zeppieri
* @version $Revision: 1.9 $
* @modified $Id: Hashtable.java,v 1.9 2000/12/17 09:15:51 bryce Exp $ */
*/
class Enumerator implements Enumeration
{
static final int KEYS = 0;