c++: ICE with template NEW_EXPR [PR105803]

Here we ICE because value_dependent_expression_p gets a NEW_EXPR
whose operand is a type, and we go to the default case which just
calls v_d_e_p on each operand of the NEW_EXPR.  Since one of them
is a type, we crash on the new assert in t_d_e_p.

t_d_e_p has code to handle {,VEC_}NEW_EXPR, which at this point
was already performed, so I think we can handle these two codes
specifically and skip the second operand, which is always going
to be a type.

	PR c++/105803

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* pt.cc (value_dependent_expression_p): Handle {,VEC_}NEW_EXPR
	in the switch.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/template/new13.C: New test.

gcc/cp/pt.cc

@@ -27643,6 +27643,14 @@ value_dependent_expression_p (tree expression)
 	 under instantiate_non_dependent_expr; it can't be constant.  */
       return true;
 
+    case NEW_EXPR:
+    case VEC_NEW_EXPR:
+      /* The second operand is a type, which type_dependent_expression_p
+	 (and therefore value_dependent_expression_p) doesn't want to see.  */
+      return (value_dependent_expression_p (TREE_OPERAND (expression, 0))
+	      || value_dependent_expression_p (TREE_OPERAND (expression, 2))
+	      || value_dependent_expression_p (TREE_OPERAND (expression, 3)));
+
     default:
       /* A constant expression is value-dependent if any subexpression is
 	 value-dependent.  */

gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/new13.C

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// PR c++/105803
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-additional-options "-fchecking=2" }
+
+namespace std {
+template <typename> class shared_ptr {};
+}
+struct S {};
+template <int> void build_matrices() {
+  std::shared_ptr<S>(new S);
+}