c++: Diagnose self-recursive satisfaction

This patch further extends the satisfaction_cache class to diagnose
self-recursive satisfaction.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* constraint.cc (sat_entry::evaluating): New member.
	(satisfaction_cache::get): If entry->evaluating, diagnose
	self-recursive satisfaction.  Otherwise, set entry->evaluating
	if we're not reusing a cached satisfaction result.
	(satisfaction_cache::save): Clear entry->evaluating.
	(satisfy_atom): Set up diagnosing_failed_constraint before the
	first call to get().

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR c++/96840
	* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr88395.C: Adjust to expect the
	self-recursive satisfaction to get directly diagnosed.
	* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-recursive-sat2.C: Likewise.
	* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-recursive-sat4.C: New test.
This commit is contained in:
Patrick Palka 2020-12-17 22:18:07 -05:00
parent 20f292863f
commit 79f57d5cb0
4 changed files with 49 additions and 17 deletions

View file

@ -2428,6 +2428,11 @@ struct GTY((for_user)) sat_entry
We don't always want to do so, in order to avoid emitting duplicate
diagnostics in some cases. */
bool diagnose_instability;
/* True if we're in the middle of computing this satisfaction result.
Used during both quiet and noisy satisfaction to detect self-recursive
satisfaction. */
bool evaluating;
};
struct sat_hasher : ggc_ptr_hash<sat_entry>
@ -2572,6 +2577,7 @@ satisfaction_cache
mapping, we set this flag (in satisfy_atom) only if substitution
into its mapping previously failed. */
entry->diagnose_instability = true;
entry->evaluating = false;
*slot = entry;
}
else
@ -2590,9 +2596,23 @@ satisfaction_cache::get ()
if (!entry)
return NULL_TREE;
if (info.noisy () || entry->maybe_unstable)
/* We're recomputing the satisfaction result from scratch. */
return NULL_TREE;
if (entry->evaluating)
{
/* If we get here, it means satisfaction is self-recursive. */
gcc_checking_assert (!entry->result);
if (info.noisy ())
error_at (EXPR_LOCATION (ATOMIC_CONSTR_EXPR (entry->atom)),
"satisfaction of atomic constraint %qE depends on itself",
entry->atom);
return error_mark_node;
}
if (info.noisy () || entry->maybe_unstable || !entry->result)
{
/* We're computing the satisfaction result from scratch. */
entry->evaluating = true;
return NULL_TREE;
}
else
return entry->result;
}
@ -2607,6 +2627,9 @@ satisfaction_cache::save (tree result)
if (!entry)
return result;
gcc_checking_assert (entry->evaluating);
entry->evaluating = false;
if (entry->result && result != entry->result)
{
if (info.quiet ())
@ -2856,6 +2879,11 @@ static void diagnose_atomic_constraint (tree, tree, tree, subst_info);
static tree
satisfy_atom (tree t, tree args, sat_info info)
{
/* In case there is a diagnostic, we want to establish the context
prior to printing errors. If no errors occur, this context is
removed before returning. */
diagnosing_failed_constraint failure (t, args, info.noisy ());
satisfaction_cache cache (t, args, info);
if (tree r = cache.get ())
return r;
@ -2863,11 +2891,6 @@ satisfy_atom (tree t, tree args, sat_info info)
/* Perform substitution quietly. */
subst_info quiet (tf_none, NULL_TREE);
/* In case there is a diagnostic, we want to establish the context
prior to printing errors. If no errors occur, this context is
removed before returning. */
diagnosing_failed_constraint failure (t, args, info.noisy ());
/* Instantiate the parameter mapping. */
tree map = tsubst_parameter_mapping (ATOMIC_CONSTR_MAP (t), args, quiet);
if (map == error_mark_node)

View file

@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
template <class T, class U>
concept Concept2 = requires (T t, U u)
concept Concept2 = requires (T t, U u) // { dg-error "depends on itself" }
{
t += u; // { dg-error "template instantiation depth" }
t += u;
};
template <class T>
@ -17,7 +17,5 @@ struct S
constexpr S operator * (S a, S b)
{
return a += b;
return a += b; // { dg-error "no match" }
}
// { dg-prune-output "compilation terminated" }

View file

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
template<typename T>
concept Fooable = requires(T t) { foo(t); }; // { dg-error "template instantiation depth" }
concept Fooable = requires(T t) { foo(t); }; // { dg-error "depends on itself" }
template<Fooable T>
void foo(T t) { }
@ -9,7 +9,5 @@ void foo(T t) { }
void test()
{
struct S {} s;
foo(s);
foo(s); // { dg-error "no match" }
}
// { dg-prune-output "compilation terminated" }

View file

@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
// PR c++/96840
// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
template <class T, class U> concept C = requires(T t, U u) { t * u; };
// { dg-message "required for the satisfaction of 'C<T, Rep>' .with T = Int<int>; Rep = int." "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
// { dg-error "depends on itself" "" { target *-*-* } .-2 }
template <class Rep> struct Int {
template <class T> requires C<T, Rep> friend void operator*(T, Int) { }
template <class T> requires C<T, Rep> friend void operator*(Int, T) { }
};
void f() { 0 * Int<int>{}; }