[PR target/115478] Accept ADD, IOR or XOR when combining objects with no bits in common

So the change to prefer ADD over IOR for combining two objects with no bits in
common is (IMHO) generally good.  It has some minor fallout.

In particular the aarch64 port (and I suspect others) have patterns that
recognize IOR, but not PLUS or XOR for these cases and thus tests which
expected to optimize with IOR are no longer optimizing.

Roger suggested using a code iterator for this purpose.  Richard S. suggested a
new match operator to cover those cases.

I really like the match operator idea, but as Richard S. notes in the PR it
would require either not validating the "no bits in common", which dramatically
reduces the utility IMHO or we'd need some work to allow consistent results
without polluting the nonzero bits cache.

So this patch goes back to Roger's idea of just using a match iterator in the
aarch64 backend (and presumably anywhere else we see this popping up).

Bootstrapped and regression tested on aarch64-linux-gnu where it fixes
bitint-args.c (as expected).

	PR target/115478
gcc/
	* config/aarch64/iterators.md (any_or_plus): New code iterator.
	* config/aarch64/aarch64.md (extr<mode>5_insn): Use any_or_plus.
	(extr<mode>5_insn_alt, extrsi5_insn_uxtw): Likewise.
	(extrsi5_insn_uxtw_alt, extrsi5_insn_di): Likewise.

gcc/testsuite/
	* gcc.target/aarch64/bitint-args.c: Update expected output.
This commit is contained in:
Jeff Law 2025-02-11 16:55:03 -07:00
parent 556248d7d2
commit 71f6540fc5
3 changed files with 33 additions and 25 deletions

View file

@ -6194,10 +6194,11 @@
(define_insn "*extr<mode>5_insn"
[(set (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
(ior:GPI (ashift:GPI (match_operand:GPI 1 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 3 "const_int_operand" "n"))
(lshiftrt:GPI (match_operand:GPI 2 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 4 "const_int_operand" "n"))))]
(any_or_plus:GPI
(ashift:GPI (match_operand:GPI 1 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 3 "const_int_operand" "n"))
(lshiftrt:GPI (match_operand:GPI 2 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 4 "const_int_operand" "n"))))]
"UINTVAL (operands[3]) < GET_MODE_BITSIZE (<MODE>mode) &&
(UINTVAL (operands[3]) + UINTVAL (operands[4]) == GET_MODE_BITSIZE (<MODE>mode))"
"extr\\t%<w>0, %<w>1, %<w>2, %4"
@ -6208,10 +6209,11 @@
;; so we have to match both orderings.
(define_insn "*extr<mode>5_insn_alt"
[(set (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
(ior:GPI (lshiftrt:GPI (match_operand:GPI 2 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 4 "const_int_operand" "n"))
(ashift:GPI (match_operand:GPI 1 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 3 "const_int_operand" "n"))))]
(any_or_plus:GPI
(lshiftrt:GPI (match_operand:GPI 2 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 4 "const_int_operand" "n"))
(ashift:GPI (match_operand:GPI 1 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 3 "const_int_operand" "n"))))]
"UINTVAL (operands[3]) < GET_MODE_BITSIZE (<MODE>mode)
&& (UINTVAL (operands[3]) + UINTVAL (operands[4])
== GET_MODE_BITSIZE (<MODE>mode))"
@ -6223,10 +6225,11 @@
(define_insn "*extrsi5_insn_uxtw"
[(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
(zero_extend:DI
(ior:SI (ashift:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 3 "const_int_operand" "n"))
(lshiftrt:SI (match_operand:SI 2 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 4 "const_int_operand" "n")))))]
(any_or_plus:SI
(ashift:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 3 "const_int_operand" "n"))
(lshiftrt:SI (match_operand:SI 2 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 4 "const_int_operand" "n")))))]
"UINTVAL (operands[3]) < 32 &&
(UINTVAL (operands[3]) + UINTVAL (operands[4]) == 32)"
"extr\\t%w0, %w1, %w2, %4"
@ -6236,10 +6239,11 @@
(define_insn "*extrsi5_insn_uxtw_alt"
[(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
(zero_extend:DI
(ior:SI (lshiftrt:SI (match_operand:SI 2 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 4 "const_int_operand" "n"))
(ashift:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 3 "const_int_operand" "n")))))]
(any_or_plus:SI
(lshiftrt:SI (match_operand:SI 2 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 4 "const_int_operand" "n"))
(ashift:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 3 "const_int_operand" "n")))))]
"UINTVAL (operands[3]) < 32 &&
(UINTVAL (operands[3]) + UINTVAL (operands[4]) == 32)"
"extr\\t%w0, %w1, %w2, %4"
@ -6248,13 +6252,13 @@
(define_insn "*extrsi5_insn_di"
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
(ior:SI (ashift:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 3 "const_int_operand" "n"))
(match_operator:SI 6 "subreg_lowpart_operator"
[(zero_extract:DI
(match_operand:DI 2 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 5 "const_int_operand" "n")
(match_operand 4 "const_int_operand" "n"))])))]
(any_or_plus:SI (ashift:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 3 "const_int_operand" "n"))
(match_operator:SI 6 "subreg_lowpart_operator"
[(zero_extract:DI
(match_operand:DI 2 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand 5 "const_int_operand" "n")
(match_operand 4 "const_int_operand" "n"))])))]
"UINTVAL (operands[3]) < 32
&& UINTVAL (operands[3]) + UINTVAL (operands[4]) == 32
&& INTVAL (operands[3]) == INTVAL (operands[5])"

View file

@ -2657,6 +2657,10 @@
;; Code iterator for logical operations
(define_code_iterator LOGICAL [and ior xor])
;; Code iterator for operations that are equivalent when the
;; two input operands are known have disjoint bits set.
(define_code_iterator any_or_plus [plus ior xor])
;; LOGICAL with plus, for when | gets converted to +.
(define_code_iterator LOGICAL_OR_PLUS [and ior xor plus])

View file

@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ CHECK_ARG(65)
** f65:
** extr (x[0-9]+), x3, x2, 1
** and (x[0-9]+), x2, 1
** orr (x[0-9]+), \2, \1, lsl 1
** add (x[0-9]+), \2, \1, lsl 1
** asr (x[0-9]+), \1, 63
** stp \3, \4, \[x0\]
** ret
@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ CHECK_ARG(127)
** f127:
** extr (x[0-9]+), x3, x2, 63
** and (x[0-9]+), x2, 9223372036854775807
** orr (x[0-9]+), \2, \1, lsl 63
** add (x[0-9]+), \2, \1, lsl 63
** asr (x[0-9]+), \1, 1
** stp \3, \4, \[x0\]
** ret