procyberian/gcc
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

re PR c++/50020 ([C++0x] internal compiler error range for in templated class)

Browse source 
PR c++/50020
	* semantics.c (finish_call_expr): Don't look at 'this' if we
	had an explicit object argument.

From-SVN: r177567
This commit is contained in:
Jason Merrill 2011-08-08 11:32:21 -04:00 • committed by Jason Merrill
parent 473b30ce95
commit 712c948a07
4 changed files with 22 additions and 10 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
gcc/cp/ChangeLog
View file

@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
2011-08-08 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
PR c++/50020
* semantics.c (finish_call_expr): Don't look at 'this' if we
had an explicit object argument.
PR c++/50011
* typeck2.c (check_narrowing): Fix integer logic.

6
gcc/cp/semantics.c
View file

@ -2042,12 +2042,14 @@ finish_call_expr (tree fn, VEC(tree,gc) **args, bool disallow_virtual,
expressions with no type as being dependent. */
if (type_dependent_expression_p (fn)
|| any_type_dependent_arguments_p (*args)
/* For a non-static member function, we need to specifically
/* For a non-static member function that doesn't have an
explicit object argument, we need to specifically
test the type dependency of the "this" pointer because it
is not included in *ARGS even though it is considered to
be part of the list of arguments. Note that this is
related to CWG issues 515 and 1005. */
|| (non_static_member_function_p (fn)
|| (TREE_CODE (fn) != COMPONENT_REF
&& non_static_member_function_p (fn)
&& current_class_ref
&& type_dependent_expression_p (current_class_ref)))
{

2
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
View file

@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
2011-08-08 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
* g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for20.C: Adjust to test 50020 as well.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist5.C: Add 50011 test.
2011-08-07 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>

20
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for20.C
View file

@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
// PR c++/49834
// PR c++/50020
// { dg-options -std=c++0x }
struct A
@ -17,16 +18,19 @@ struct C
};
template <typename Ret>
Ret f(const C &p)
struct D
{
for (const B &i: p) // OK
i.second.get_value<int>();
for (const auto &i: p) // ERROR
i.second.get_value<int>();
return Ret(0);
}
Ret f(const C &p)
{
for (const B &i: p) // OK
i.second.get_value<int>();
for (const auto &i: p) // ERROR
i.second.get_value<int>();
return Ret(0);
}
};
void g()
{
f<int>(C());
D<int>().f(C());
}