analyzer: fix defaults in compound assignments from non-zero offsets [PR112969]

Confusion in binding_cluster::maybe_get_compound_binding about whether
offsets are relative to the start of the region or to the start of the
cluster was leading to incorrect handling of default values, leading
to false positives from -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value, from
-Wanalyzer-exposure-through-uninit-copy, and other logic errors.

Fixed thusly.

gcc/analyzer/ChangeLog:
	PR analyzer/112969
	* store.cc (binding_cluster::maybe_get_compound_binding): When
	populating default_map, express the bit-range of the default key
	for REG relative to REG, rather than to the base region.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
	PR analyzer/112969
	* c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-5.c (test_3): Remove
	xfails, reorder tests.
	* c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-pr112969.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/plugin/infoleak-pr112969.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/plugin/plugin.exp: Add infoleak-pr112969.c to
	analyzer_kernel_plugin.c tests.

Signed-off-by: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>

gcc/analyzer/store.cc

@@ -1759,7 +1759,16 @@ binding_cluster::maybe_get_compound_binding (store_manager *mgr,
   else
     default_sval = sval_mgr->get_or_create_initial_value (reg);
   const binding_key *default_key = binding_key::make (mgr, reg);
-  default_map.put (default_key, default_sval);
+
+  /* Express the bit-range of the default key for REG relative to REG,
+     rather than to the base region.  */
+  const concrete_binding *concrete_default_key
+    = default_key->dyn_cast_concrete_binding ();
+  if (!concrete_default_key)
+    return nullptr;
+  const concrete_binding *default_key_relative_to_reg
+     = mgr->get_concrete_binding (0, concrete_default_key->get_size_in_bits ());
+  default_map.put (default_key_relative_to_reg, default_sval);
 
   for (map_t::iterator iter = m_map.begin (); iter != m_map.end (); ++iter)
     {

gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-5.c

@@ -48,9 +48,8 @@ void test_3 (void)
 
   glob_arr3[7] = arr[3]; // or should the uninit warning be here?
 
-  __analyzer_eval (glob_arr3[7].x); /* { dg-warning "uninitialized" "uninit" { xfail *-*-* } } */
-  /* { dg-bogus "UNKNOWN" "unknown" { xfail *-*-* } .-1 } */
   __analyzer_eval (glob_arr3[7].y == 6); /* { dg-warning "TRUE" } */
+  __analyzer_eval (glob_arr3[7].x); /* { dg-warning "uninitialized" "uninit" } */
 }
 
 /* Symbolic bindings: copying from one array to another.  */

gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/compound-assignment-pr112969.c

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+/* Reduced from -Wanalyzer-exposure-through-uninit-copy false positives
+   seen in Linux kernel in drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c  */
+
+#include "analyzer-decls.h"
+
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+struct hwtstamp_config
+{
+  int flags;
+  int tx_type;
+  int rx_filter;
+};
+
+struct ice_ptp
+{
+  long placeholder;
+  struct hwtstamp_config tstamp_config;
+};
+
+struct ice_pf
+{
+  struct ice_ptp ptp;
+};
+
+void
+ice_ptp_set_ts_config(struct ice_pf* pf)
+{
+  struct hwtstamp_config config;
+  pf->ptp.tstamp_config.tx_type = 1;
+  pf->ptp.tstamp_config.rx_filter = 2;
+  config = pf->ptp.tstamp_config;
+  __analyzer_eval (config.flags == pf->ptp.tstamp_config.flags); /* { dg-warning "TRUE" } */
+  /* { dg-bogus "use of uninitialized value 'config.flags'" "PR analyzer/112969" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
+}

gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/infoleak-pr112969.c

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/* Reduced from -Wanalyzer-exposure-through-uninit-copy false positives
+   seen in Linux kernel in drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c  */
+
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-fanalyzer" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target analyzer } */
+
+extern unsigned long
+copy_from_user(void* to, const void* from, unsigned long n);
+
+extern unsigned long
+copy_to_user(void* to, const void* from, unsigned long n);
+
+struct ifreq
+{
+  union
+  {
+    void* ifru_data;
+  } ifr_ifru;
+};
+
+struct hwtstamp_config
+{
+  int flags;
+  int tx_type;
+  int rx_filter;
+};
+
+struct ice_ptp
+{
+  long placeholder;
+  struct hwtstamp_config tstamp_config;
+};
+
+struct ice_pf
+{
+  struct ice_ptp ptp;
+};
+int
+ice_ptp_set_ts_config(struct ice_pf* pf, struct ifreq* ifr)
+{
+  struct hwtstamp_config config;
+  int err;
+  if (copy_from_user(&config, ifr->ifr_ifru.ifru_data, sizeof(config)))
+    return -14;
+  pf->ptp.tstamp_config.tx_type = 0;
+  pf->ptp.tstamp_config.rx_filter = 0;
+  config = pf->ptp.tstamp_config;
+  if (copy_to_user(ifr->ifr_ifru.ifru_data, &config, sizeof(config))) /* { dg-bogus "-Wanalyzer-exposure-through-uninit-copy" "PR analyzer/112969" } */
+    return -14;
+  return 0;
+}

gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/plugin.exp

@@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ set plugin_test_list [list \
 	  infoleak-CVE-2017-18550-1.c \
 	  infoleak-antipatterns-1.c \
 	  infoleak-fixit-1.c \
+	  infoleak-pr112969.c \
 	  infoleak-uninit-size-1.c \
 	  infoleak-uninit-size-2.c \
 	  infoleak-net-ethtool-ioctl.c \