bitfld1.C: expected failure

* g++.old-deja/g++.other/bitfld1.C: expected failure
	* g++.old-deja/g++.other/nested2.C: ditto
	* g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb132.C: no longer an expected failure

From-SVN: r22633

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+1998-09-28  Alexandre Oliva  <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br>
+
+	* g++.old-deja/g++.other/bitfld1.C: expected failure
+	* g++.old-deja/g++.other/nested2.C: ditto
+	* g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb132.C: no longer an expected failure
+
 1998-09-26  Alexandre Oliva  <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br>
 
 	* g++.old-deja/g++.other/bitfld1.C: built-in operator!= should be

gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/bitfld1.C

@@ -1,12 +1,14 @@
 // Build don't link:
 // Based on a bug report by Stephen Vavasis <vavasis@CS.Cornell.EDU>
 
+// excess errors test - XFAIL *-*-*
+
 // declares template operator!=
 #include <utility>
 
 struct foo {
   enum e { bar } baz:1;
   void test() { 
-    baz != bar; // XFAIL *-*-*
+    baz != bar;
   }
 };

gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/nested2.C

@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 // Build don't link:
 // by Bert Bril <bert@dgb.nl>
 
+// excess errors test - XFAIL *-*-*
+
 struct M1 {
     struct I                            {};
 };

gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb132.C

@@ -9,8 +9,6 @@
 //
 // They vanish if the declaration of a::b is taken out.
 
-// excess errors test - XFAIL *-*-*
-
 #include <string>
 
 string foo();