c++: explicit inst w/ similar constrained partial specs [PR104634]

Here we neglect to emit the definitions of A<double>::f2 and A<double*>::f4
despite the explicit instantiations ultimately because TREE_PUBLIC isn't
set on the corresponding partial specializations, whose declarations are
created from maybe_new_partial_specialization which is responsible for
disambiguating them from the first and third partial specializations (which
have the same class-head but different constraints).  This makes grokfndecl
in turn clear TREE_PUBLIC for f2 and f4 as if they have internal linkage.

This patch fixes this by setting TREE_PUBLIC appropriately for such partial
specializations.

	PR c++/104634

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* pt.cc (maybe_new_partial_specialization): Propagate TREE_PUBLIC
	to the newly created partial specialization.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-explicit-inst6.C: New test.

Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Patrick Palka 2024-01-15 16:53:28 -05:00
parent d33c3b5ac9
commit 47673571b2
2 changed files with 36 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -980,6 +980,7 @@ maybe_new_partial_specialization (tree& type)
DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (d) = input_location;
TREE_PRIVATE (d) = (current_access_specifier == access_private_node);
TREE_PROTECTED (d) = (current_access_specifier == access_protected_node);
TREE_PUBLIC (d) = TREE_PUBLIC (DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (tmpl));
set_instantiating_module (d);
DECL_MODULE_EXPORT_P (d) = DECL_MODULE_EXPORT_P (tmpl);

View file

@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
// PR c++/104634
// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_ZN1AIiE2f1Ev" } }
// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_ZN1AIdE2f2Ev" } }
// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_ZN1AIPiE2f3Ev" } }
// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_ZN1AIPdE2f4Ev" } }
template<class T>
struct A { };
template<class T> requires __is_same(T, int)
struct A<T> {
void f1() { }
};
template<class T> requires __is_same(T, double)
struct A<T> {
void f2() { }
};
template<class T> requires __is_same(T, int)
struct A<T*> {
void f3() { }
};
template<class T> requires __is_same(T, double)
struct A<T*> {
void f4() { }
};
template struct A<int>;
template struct A<double>;
template struct A<int*>;
template struct A<double*>;