preprocessor: Make __has_include a builtin macro [PR93452]

The clever hack of '#define __has_include __has_include' breaks -dD
and -fdirectives-only, because that emits definitions.  This turns
__has_include into a proper builtin macro.  Thus it's never emitted
via -dD, and because use outside of directive processing is undefined,
we can just expand it anywhere.

	PR preprocessor/93452
	* internal.h (struct spec_nodes): Drop n__has_include{,_next}.
	* directives.c (lex_macro_node): Don't check __has_include redef.
	* expr.c (eval_token): Drop __has_include eval.
	(parse_has_include): Move to ...
	* macro.c (builtin_has_include): ... here.
	(_cpp_builtin_macro_text): Eval __has_include{,_next}.
	* include/cpplib.h (enum cpp_builtin_type): Add BT_HAS_INCLUDE{,_NEXT}.
	* init.c (builtin_array): Add them.
	(cpp_init_builtins): Drop __has_include{,_next} init here ...
	* pch.c (cpp_read_state): ... and here.
	* traditional.c (enum ls): Drop has_include states ...
	(_cpp_scan_out_logical_line): ... and here.
This commit is contained in:
Nathan Sidwell 2020-01-28 07:58:29 -08:00
parent a5d81aaab6
commit 3d056cbfb3
11 changed files with 103 additions and 93 deletions

View file

@ -336,6 +336,56 @@ unsigned num_expanded_macros_counter = 0;
from macro expansion. */
unsigned num_macro_tokens_counter = 0;
/* Handle meeting "__has_include" builtin macro. */
static int
builtin_has_include (cpp_reader *pfile, cpp_hashnode *op, bool has_next)
{
int result = 0;
pfile->state.angled_headers = true;
const cpp_token *token = cpp_get_token (pfile);
bool paren = token->type == CPP_OPEN_PAREN;
if (paren)
token = cpp_get_token (pfile);
else
cpp_error (pfile, CPP_DL_ERROR,
"missing '(' before \"%s\" operand", NODE_NAME (op));
pfile->state.angled_headers = false;
bool bracket = token->type != CPP_STRING;
char *fname = NULL;
if (token->type == CPP_STRING || token->type == CPP_HEADER_NAME)
{
fname = XNEWVEC (char, token->val.str.len - 1);
memcpy (fname, token->val.str.text + 1, token->val.str.len - 2);
fname[token->val.str.len - 2] = '\0';
}
else if (token->type == CPP_LESS)
fname = _cpp_bracket_include (pfile);
else
cpp_error (pfile, CPP_DL_ERROR,
"operator \"%s\" requires a header-name", NODE_NAME (op));
if (fname)
{
/* Do not do the lookup if we're skipping, that's unnecessary
IO. */
if (!pfile->state.skip_eval
&& _cpp_has_header (pfile, fname, bracket,
has_next ? IT_INCLUDE_NEXT : IT_INCLUDE))
result = 1;
XDELETEVEC (fname);
}
if (paren && !SEEN_EOL () && cpp_get_token (pfile)->type != CPP_CLOSE_PAREN)
cpp_error (pfile, CPP_DL_ERROR,
"missing ')' after \"%s\" operand", NODE_NAME (op));
return result;
}
/* Emits a warning if NODE is a macro defined in the main file that
has not been used. */
int
@ -572,6 +622,12 @@ _cpp_builtin_macro_text (cpp_reader *pfile, cpp_hashnode *node,
case BT_HAS_BUILTIN:
number = pfile->cb.has_builtin (pfile);
break;
case BT_HAS_INCLUDE:
case BT_HAS_INCLUDE_NEXT:
number = builtin_has_include (pfile, node,
node->value.builtin == BT_HAS_INCLUDE_NEXT);
break;
}
if (result == NULL)