testsuite: effective_target_march_option: support checking for -march=*
* lib/target-supports.exp (effective_target_march_option): New. I see no (other) way to, depending on the absence of an option, add an option for a specific target. For gcc.dg/torture/pr26515.c and cris-elf, you get an error for supplying multiple (different) -march=... options (where that error is desirable), like testing cris-elf with RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=cris-sim/arch=v8, where otherwise -march=v10 and -march=v8 will both be given, and the test would fail. For historians, this was accidentally misordered and committed after the (first) patch using march_option. Oops.
This commit is contained in:
parent
0042bafd4b
commit
3684bbb022
2 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
|
|||
-march=v10 option on target ! march_option.
|
||||
* gcc.target/cris/asm-v10.S, gcc.target/cris/inasm-v10.c,
|
||||
gcc.target/cris/sync-1-v10.c: Similar.
|
||||
* lib/target-supports.exp (effective_target_march_option): New.
|
||||
|
||||
2020-01-19 Thomas König <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2477,6 +2477,10 @@ proc check_effective_target_ti_c64xp { } {
|
|||
}]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Check if a -march=... option is given, as part of (earlier) options.
|
||||
proc check_effective_target_march_option { } {
|
||||
return [check-flags [list "" { *-*-* } { "-march=*" } { "" } ]]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
proc check_alpha_max_hw_available { } {
|
||||
return [check_runtime alpha_max_hw_available {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue