Fortran: fix issue with impure elemental subroutine and interface [PR119656]
PR fortran/119656 gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: * interface.cc (gfc_compare_actual_formal): Fix front-end memleak when searching for matching interfaces. * trans-expr.cc (gfc_conv_procedure_call): If there is a formal dummy corresponding to an absent argument, use its type, and only fall back to inferred type otherwise. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gfortran.dg/optional_absent_13.f90: New test.
This commit is contained in:
parent
4645d09296
commit
334545194d
3 changed files with 65 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -3382,7 +3382,11 @@ gfc_compare_actual_formal (gfc_actual_arglist **ap, gfc_formal_arglist *formal,
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
a->associated_dummy = get_nonintrinsic_dummy_arg (f);
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (a->associated_dummy)
|
||||
free (a->associated_dummy);
|
||||
a->associated_dummy = get_nonintrinsic_dummy_arg (f);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (a->expr == NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -6925,10 +6925,18 @@ gfc_conv_procedure_call (gfc_se * se, gfc_symbol * sym,
|
|||
{
|
||||
/* Pass a NULL pointer for an absent arg. */
|
||||
parmse.expr = null_pointer_node;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Is it an absent character dummy? */
|
||||
bool absent_char = false;
|
||||
gfc_dummy_arg * const dummy_arg = arg->associated_dummy;
|
||||
if (dummy_arg
|
||||
&& gfc_dummy_arg_get_typespec (*dummy_arg).type
|
||||
== BT_CHARACTER)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Fall back to inferred type only if no formal. */
|
||||
if (fsym)
|
||||
absent_char = (fsym->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER);
|
||||
else if (dummy_arg)
|
||||
absent_char = (gfc_dummy_arg_get_typespec (*dummy_arg).type
|
||||
== BT_CHARACTER);
|
||||
if (absent_char)
|
||||
parmse.string_length = build_int_cst (gfc_charlen_type_node,
|
||||
0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -6954,9 +6962,7 @@ gfc_conv_procedure_call (gfc_se * se, gfc_symbol * sym,
|
|||
|| !CLASS_DATA (fsym)->attr.allocatable));
|
||||
gfc_init_se (&parmse, NULL);
|
||||
parmse.expr = null_pointer_node;
|
||||
if (arg->associated_dummy
|
||||
&& gfc_dummy_arg_get_typespec (*arg->associated_dummy).type
|
||||
== BT_CHARACTER)
|
||||
if (fsym->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER)
|
||||
parmse.string_length = build_int_cst (gfc_charlen_type_node, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (fsym && fsym->ts.type == BT_CLASS
|
||||
|
|
48
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/optional_absent_13.f90
Normal file
48
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/optional_absent_13.f90
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
|
|||
! { dg-do run }
|
||||
! PR fortran/119656 - wrong code with impure elemental subroutine and interface
|
||||
!
|
||||
! Derived from testcase at:
|
||||
! https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/
|
||||
! problem-with-impure-elemental-subroutine-in-interface-with-gfortran/9545
|
||||
|
||||
module m2
|
||||
implicit none
|
||||
interface foo
|
||||
module procedure foo_mat
|
||||
module procedure foo_df
|
||||
module procedure foo_cmat
|
||||
end interface foo
|
||||
contains
|
||||
|
||||
subroutine foo_mat(x, nacf, label)
|
||||
real, intent(in) :: x(:,:)
|
||||
integer, intent(in) :: nacf
|
||||
character(len=*), intent(in), optional :: label
|
||||
end subroutine foo_mat
|
||||
|
||||
impure elemental subroutine foo_df(nacf, outu, xstr)
|
||||
integer , intent(in) :: nacf
|
||||
integer , intent(in), optional :: outu
|
||||
character(len=*), intent(in), optional :: xstr
|
||||
if (present(xstr)) then
|
||||
if (len (xstr) /= 2) then
|
||||
print *,"nacf, len(xstr) =", nacf, len(xstr)
|
||||
stop nacf
|
||||
end if
|
||||
end if
|
||||
end subroutine foo_df
|
||||
|
||||
subroutine foo_cmat(x, nacf, label)
|
||||
complex, intent(in) :: x(:,:)
|
||||
integer, intent(in) :: nacf
|
||||
character(len=*), intent(in), optional :: label
|
||||
end subroutine foo_cmat
|
||||
|
||||
end module m2
|
||||
|
||||
program main
|
||||
use m2, only: foo, foo_df
|
||||
implicit none
|
||||
call foo_df(nacf = 1, xstr="ab")
|
||||
call foo (nacf = 2, xstr="ab")
|
||||
end program main
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue