i386: Fix FAIL of gcc.target/i386/pr91681-1.c
The recent change in TImode parameter passing on x86_64 results in the FAIL of pr91681-1.c. The issue is that with the extra flexibility, the combine pass is now spoilt for choice between using either the *add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat or the *add<dwi>3_doubleword_zext patterns, when one operand is a *concat and the other is a zero_extend. The solution proposed below is provide an *add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat_zext define_insn_and_split, that can benefit both from the register allocation of *concat, and still avoid the xor normally required by zero extension. I'm investigating a follow-up refinement to improve register allocation further by avoiding the early clobber in the =&r, and handling (custom) reloads explicitly, but this piece resolves the testcase failure. 2023-07-12 Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com> gcc/ChangeLog PR target/91681 * config/i386/i386.md (*add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat_zext): New define_insn_and_split derived from *add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat and *add<dwi>3_doubleword_zext.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d2c18b4a16
commit
275a2124e4
1 changed files with 33 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -6294,6 +6294,39 @@
|
|||
(clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])]
|
||||
"split_double_mode (<DWI>mode, &operands[0], 2, &operands[0], &operands[5]);")
|
||||
|
||||
(define_insn_and_split "*add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat_zext"
|
||||
[(set (match_operand:<DWI> 0 "register_operand" "=&r")
|
||||
(plus:<DWI>
|
||||
(any_or_plus:<DWI>
|
||||
(ashift:<DWI>
|
||||
(zero_extend:<DWI>
|
||||
(match_operand:DWIH 2 "nonimmediate_operand" "rm"))
|
||||
(match_operand:QI 3 "const_int_operand"))
|
||||
(zero_extend:<DWI>
|
||||
(match_operand:DWIH 4 "nonimmediate_operand" "rm")))
|
||||
(zero_extend:<DWI>
|
||||
(match_operand:DWIH 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "rm")))
|
||||
(clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))]
|
||||
"INTVAL (operands[3]) == <MODE_SIZE> * BITS_PER_UNIT"
|
||||
"#"
|
||||
"&& reload_completed"
|
||||
[(set (match_dup 0) (match_dup 4))
|
||||
(set (match_dup 5) (match_dup 2))
|
||||
(parallel [(set (reg:CCC FLAGS_REG)
|
||||
(compare:CCC
|
||||
(plus:DWIH (match_dup 0) (match_dup 1))
|
||||
(match_dup 0)))
|
||||
(set (match_dup 0)
|
||||
(plus:DWIH (match_dup 0) (match_dup 1)))])
|
||||
(parallel [(set (match_dup 5)
|
||||
(plus:DWIH
|
||||
(plus:DWIH
|
||||
(ltu:DWIH (reg:CC FLAGS_REG) (const_int 0))
|
||||
(match_dup 5))
|
||||
(const_int 0)))
|
||||
(clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])]
|
||||
"split_double_mode (<DWI>mode, &operands[0], 1, &operands[0], &operands[5]);")
|
||||
|
||||
(define_insn "*add<mode>_1"
|
||||
[(set (match_operand:SWI48 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=rm,r,r,r")
|
||||
(plus:SWI48
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue