re PR c++/44909 ([C++0x] Copy constructors implicitly deleted)

PR c++/44909
	* call.c (add_function_candidate): If we're working on an implicit
	declaration, don't consider candidates that won't match.
	* typeck.c (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p): Now a fn.
	* cp-tree.h (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p): Adjust.

	Revert:
	* cp-tree.h (struct lang_type_class): Add has_user_opeq.
	(TYPE_HAS_USER_OPEQ): New.
	* decl.c (grok_special_member_properties): Set it.
	* class.c (add_implicitly_declared_members): Don't lazily declare
	constructors/operator= if a base or member has a user-declared one.
	(check_bases_and_members, check_bases): Adjust.
	(check_field_decls, check_field_decl): Adjust.

From-SVN: r162233
This commit is contained in:
Jason Merrill 2010-07-15 16:45:35 -04:00 committed by Jason Merrill
parent 8e7af53e4a
commit 10746f3715
10 changed files with 142 additions and 75 deletions

View file

@ -1,3 +1,20 @@
2010-07-15 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
PR c++/44909
* call.c (add_function_candidate): If we're working on an implicit
declaration, don't consider candidates that won't match.
* typeck.c (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p): Now a fn.
* cp-tree.h (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p): Adjust.
Revert:
* cp-tree.h (struct lang_type_class): Add has_user_opeq.
(TYPE_HAS_USER_OPEQ): New.
* decl.c (grok_special_member_properties): Set it.
* class.c (add_implicitly_declared_members): Don't lazily declare
constructors/operator= if a base or member has a user-declared one.
(check_bases_and_members, check_bases): Adjust.
(check_field_decls, check_field_decl): Adjust.
2010-07-15 Anatoly Sokolov <aesok@post.ru>
* decl.c (integer_three_node): Remove.

View file

@ -1596,6 +1596,27 @@ add_function_candidate (struct z_candidate **candidates,
else if (!sufficient_parms_p (parmnode))
viable = 0;
/* Kludge: When looking for a function from a subobject while generating
an implicit copy/move constructor/operator=, don't consider anything
that takes (a reference to) a different type. See c++/44909. */
else if (flags & LOOKUP_SPECULATIVE)
{
if (DECL_CONSTRUCTOR_P (fn))
i = 1;
else if (DECL_ASSIGNMENT_OPERATOR_P (fn)
&& DECL_OVERLOADED_OPERATOR_P (fn) == NOP_EXPR)
i = 2;
else
i = 0;
if (i && len == i)
{
parmnode = chain_index (i-1, parmlist);
if (!(same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p
(non_reference (TREE_VALUE (parmnode)), ctype)))
viable = 0;
}
}
if (! viable)
goto out;

View file

@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static void finish_struct_methods (tree);
static void maybe_warn_about_overly_private_class (tree);
static int method_name_cmp (const void *, const void *);
static int resort_method_name_cmp (const void *, const void *);
static void add_implicitly_declared_members (tree, int, int, int, int);
static void add_implicitly_declared_members (tree, int, int);
static tree fixed_type_or_null (tree, int *, int *);
static tree build_simple_base_path (tree expr, tree binfo);
static tree build_vtbl_ref_1 (tree, tree);
@ -139,13 +139,13 @@ static void build_vtbl_initializer (tree, tree, tree, tree, int *,
static int count_fields (tree);
static int add_fields_to_record_type (tree, struct sorted_fields_type*, int);
static bool check_bitfield_decl (tree);
static void check_field_decl (tree, tree, int *, int *, int *, int *, int *);
static void check_field_decls (tree, tree *, int *, int *, int *, int *);
static void check_field_decl (tree, tree, int *, int *, int *);
static void check_field_decls (tree, tree *, int *, int *);
static tree *build_base_field (record_layout_info, tree, splay_tree, tree *);
static void build_base_fields (record_layout_info, splay_tree, tree *);
static void check_methods (tree);
static void remove_zero_width_bit_fields (tree);
static void check_bases (tree, int *, int *, int *, int *);
static void check_bases (tree, int *, int *);
static void check_bases_and_members (tree);
static tree create_vtable_ptr (tree, tree *);
static void include_empty_classes (record_layout_info);
@ -1249,9 +1249,7 @@ handle_using_decl (tree using_decl, tree t)
static void
check_bases (tree t,
int* cant_have_const_ctor_p,
int* no_const_asn_ref_p,
int* cant_have_lazy_ctor,
int* cant_have_lazy_opeq)
int* no_const_asn_ref_p)
{
int i;
int seen_non_virtual_nearly_empty_base_p;
@ -1290,10 +1288,6 @@ check_bases (tree t,
if (TYPE_HAS_COPY_ASSIGN (basetype)
&& !TYPE_HAS_CONST_COPY_ASSIGN (basetype))
*no_const_asn_ref_p = 1;
if (TYPE_HAS_USER_CONSTRUCTOR (basetype))
*cant_have_lazy_ctor = 1;
if (TYPE_HAS_USER_OPEQ (basetype))
*cant_have_lazy_opeq = 1;
if (BINFO_VIRTUAL_P (base_binfo))
/* A virtual base does not effect nearly emptiness. */
@ -2634,9 +2628,7 @@ maybe_add_class_template_decl_list (tree type, tree t, int friend_p)
static void
add_implicitly_declared_members (tree t,
int cant_have_const_cctor,
int cant_have_const_assignment,
int cant_have_lazy_ctor,
int cant_have_lazy_opeq)
int cant_have_const_assignment)
{
/* Destructor. */
if (!CLASSTYPE_DESTRUCTORS (t))
@ -2690,26 +2682,6 @@ add_implicitly_declared_members (tree t,
CLASSTYPE_LAZY_MOVE_ASSIGN (t) = 1;
}
/* If a base or member type has a user-declared constructor or operator=,
we need to declare ours now to avoid issues with circular lazy
declarations (cpp0x/implicit6.C). */
if (cant_have_lazy_ctor)
{
if (CLASSTYPE_LAZY_DEFAULT_CTOR (t))
lazily_declare_fn (sfk_constructor, t);
if (CLASSTYPE_LAZY_COPY_CTOR (t))
lazily_declare_fn (sfk_copy_constructor, t);
if (CLASSTYPE_LAZY_MOVE_CTOR (t))
lazily_declare_fn (sfk_move_constructor, t);
}
if (cant_have_lazy_opeq)
{
if (CLASSTYPE_LAZY_COPY_ASSIGN (t))
lazily_declare_fn (sfk_copy_assignment, t);
if (CLASSTYPE_LAZY_MOVE_ASSIGN (t))
lazily_declare_fn (sfk_move_assignment, t);
}
/* We can't be lazy about declaring functions that might override
a virtual function from a base class. */
if (TYPE_POLYMORPHIC_P (t)
@ -2858,9 +2830,7 @@ check_field_decl (tree field,
tree t,
int* cant_have_const_ctor,
int* no_const_asn_ref,
int* any_default_members,
int* cant_have_lazy_ctor,
int* cant_have_lazy_opeq)
int* any_default_members)
{
tree type = strip_array_types (TREE_TYPE (field));
@ -2877,8 +2847,7 @@ check_field_decl (tree field,
for (fields = TYPE_FIELDS (type); fields; fields = DECL_CHAIN (fields))
if (TREE_CODE (fields) == FIELD_DECL && !DECL_C_BIT_FIELD (field))
check_field_decl (fields, t, cant_have_const_ctor,
no_const_asn_ref, any_default_members,
cant_have_lazy_ctor, cant_have_lazy_opeq);
no_const_asn_ref, any_default_members);
}
/* Check members with class type for constructors, destructors,
etc. */
@ -2930,11 +2899,6 @@ check_field_decl (tree field,
if (TYPE_HAS_COPY_ASSIGN (type)
&& !TYPE_HAS_CONST_COPY_ASSIGN (type))
*no_const_asn_ref = 1;
if (TYPE_HAS_USER_CONSTRUCTOR (type))
*cant_have_lazy_ctor = 1;
if (TYPE_HAS_USER_OPEQ (type))
*cant_have_lazy_opeq = 1;
}
if (DECL_INITIAL (field) != NULL_TREE)
{
@ -2974,9 +2938,7 @@ check_field_decl (tree field,
static void
check_field_decls (tree t, tree *access_decls,
int *cant_have_const_ctor_p,
int *no_const_asn_ref_p,
int *cant_have_lazy_ctor_p,
int *cant_have_lazy_opeq_p)
int *no_const_asn_ref_p)
{
tree *field;
tree *next;
@ -3168,9 +3130,7 @@ check_field_decls (tree t, tree *access_decls,
check_field_decl (x, t,
cant_have_const_ctor_p,
no_const_asn_ref_p,
&any_default_members,
cant_have_lazy_ctor_p,
cant_have_lazy_opeq_p);
&any_default_members);
/* If any field is const, the structure type is pseudo-const. */
if (CP_TYPE_CONST_P (type))
@ -4493,8 +4453,6 @@ check_bases_and_members (tree t)
/* Nonzero if the implicitly generated assignment operator
should take a non-const reference argument. */
int no_const_asn_ref;
int cant_have_lazy_ctor = 0;
int cant_have_lazy_opeq = 0;
tree access_decls;
bool saved_complex_asn_ref;
bool saved_nontrivial_dtor;
@ -4507,8 +4465,7 @@ check_bases_and_members (tree t)
/* Check all the base-classes. */
check_bases (t, &cant_have_const_ctor,
&no_const_asn_ref, &cant_have_lazy_ctor,
&cant_have_lazy_opeq);
&no_const_asn_ref);
/* Check all the method declarations. */
check_methods (t);
@ -4525,9 +4482,7 @@ check_bases_and_members (tree t)
being set appropriately. */
check_field_decls (t, &access_decls,
&cant_have_const_ctor,
&no_const_asn_ref,
&cant_have_lazy_ctor,
&cant_have_lazy_opeq);
&no_const_asn_ref);
/* A nearly-empty class has to be vptr-containing; a nearly empty
class contains just a vptr. */
@ -4599,9 +4554,7 @@ check_bases_and_members (tree t)
/* Synthesize any needed methods. */
add_implicitly_declared_members (t,
cant_have_const_ctor,
no_const_asn_ref,
cant_have_lazy_ctor,
cant_have_lazy_opeq);
no_const_asn_ref);
/* Check defaulted declarations here so we have cant_have_const_ctor
and don't need to worry about clones. */

View file

@ -289,11 +289,6 @@ typedef struct ptrmem_cst * ptrmem_cst_t;
#define same_type_p(TYPE1, TYPE2) \
comptypes ((TYPE1), (TYPE2), COMPARE_STRICT)
/* Returns nonzero iff TYPE1 and TYPE2 are the same type, ignoring
top-level qualifiers. */
#define same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p(TYPE1, TYPE2) \
same_type_p (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TYPE1), TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TYPE2))
/* Nonzero if we are presently building a statement tree, rather
than expanding each statement as we encounter it. */
#define building_stmt_tree() (cur_stmt_list != NULL_TREE)
@ -1326,7 +1321,6 @@ struct GTY(()) lang_type_class {
unsigned lazy_move_assign : 1;
unsigned has_complex_move_ctor : 1;
unsigned has_complex_move_assign : 1;
unsigned has_user_opeq : 1;
/* When adding a flag here, consider whether or not it ought to
apply to a template instance if it applies to the template. If
@ -1335,7 +1329,7 @@ struct GTY(()) lang_type_class {
/* There are some bits left to fill out a 32-bit word. Keep track
of this by updating the size of this bitfield whenever you add or
remove a flag. */
unsigned dummy : 3;
unsigned dummy : 4;
tree primary_base;
VEC(tree_pair_s,gc) *vcall_indices;
@ -3143,10 +3137,6 @@ more_aggr_init_expr_args_p (const aggr_init_expr_arg_iterator *iter)
user-declared constructor. */
#define TYPE_HAS_USER_CONSTRUCTOR(NODE) (TYPE_LANG_FLAG_1 (NODE))
/* ...or a user-declared operator=. */
#define TYPE_HAS_USER_OPEQ(NODE) \
(LANG_TYPE_CLASS_CHECK (NODE)->has_user_opeq)
/* When appearing in an INDIRECT_REF, it means that the tree structure
underneath is actually a call to a constructor. This is needed
when the constructor must initialize local storage (which can
@ -5433,6 +5423,7 @@ extern int type_unknown_p (const_tree);
enum { ce_derived, ce_normal, ce_exact };
extern bool comp_except_specs (const_tree, const_tree, int);
extern bool comptypes (tree, tree, int);
extern bool same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (tree, tree);
extern bool compparms (const_tree, const_tree);
extern int comp_cv_qualification (const_tree, const_tree);
extern int comp_cv_qual_signature (tree, tree);

View file

@ -10292,8 +10292,6 @@ grok_special_member_properties (tree decl)
int assop = copy_fn_p (decl);
if (!DECL_ARTIFICIAL (decl))
TYPE_HAS_USER_OPEQ (class_type) = 1;
if (assop)
{
TYPE_HAS_COPY_ASSIGN (class_type) = 1;

View file

@ -1503,6 +1503,18 @@ comptypes (tree t1, tree t2, int strict)
return structural_comptypes (t1, t2, strict);
}
/* Returns nonzero iff TYPE1 and TYPE2 are the same type, ignoring
top-level qualifiers. */
bool
same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (tree type1, tree type2)
{
if (type1 == error_mark_node || type2 == error_mark_node)
return false;
return same_type_p (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type1), TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type2));
}
/* Returns 1 if TYPE1 is at least as qualified as TYPE2. */
bool

View file

@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
2010-07-15 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
PR c++/44909
* g++.dg/cpp0x/implicit7.C: New.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/implicit8.C: New.
2010-07-15 Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
Disable float tests for __SPU__ targets due to lack of signed zero:

View file

@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ struct Ray;
struct Vector
{
virtual void f(); // make non-trivially-copyable
Vector();
Vector(const Ray &) ;
};
@ -18,7 +17,6 @@ struct array
struct Ray
{
array a;
operator Vector();
};
extern Ray r1;

View file

@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
// PR c++/44909
// { dg-options -std=c++0x }
// Declaring A<D<E>>'s copy ctor means choosing a ctor to initialize D<E>,
// which means choosing a ctor for C<B<E>>, which meant considering
// C(const B<E>&) which means choosing a ctor for B<E>, which means choosing
// a ctor for A<D<E>>. Cycle.
template<typename T>
struct A
{
T t;
};
template <typename T>
struct B
{
typename T::U u;
};
template <typename T>
struct C
{
C(const T&);
};
template <typename T>
struct D
{
C<B<T> > v;
};
struct E {
typedef A<D<E> > U;
};
extern A<D<E> > a;
A<D<E> > a2(a);

View file

@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
// The hack for PR c++/44909 breaks this testcase. We need feedback
// from the C++ committee to know how to proceed.
// { dg-options -std=c++0x }
// { dg-prune-output "implicitly deleted" }
// { dg-prune-output "cannot bind" }
// { dg-prune-output "initializing argument" }
struct A
{
A();
A(A&);
};
struct B;
struct BP
{
BP(const B&);
};
struct B
{
B();
B(B&&);
B(const BP&);
};
// If B(B&&) suppresses the B copy constructor, then copying the B
// subobject of C should use B(const BP&). But we ignore that constructor
// in order to break the cycle in 44909. Perhaps the move ctor shouldn't
// suppress the copy ctor?
struct C: A, B { };
C c;
C c2(c); // { dg-bogus "deleted" "" { xfail *-*-* } }