From 0fab9d0a5db8322d0a2711fb2228a99f6e317df3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Phil Edwards Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 20:20:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] howto.html: Update. 2000-07-19 Phil Edwards * docs/18_support/howto.html: Update. From-SVN: r35138 --- libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog | 4 ++++ libstdc++-v3/docs/18_support/howto.html | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog index 4dd8eaeb3bf..6f6b8126209 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog +++ b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2000-07-19 Phil Edwards + + * docs/18_support/howto.html: Update. + 2000-07-19 Benjamin Kosnik Internal consistency checks..... diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/docs/18_support/howto.html b/libstdc++-v3/docs/18_support/howto.html index 2147e1fc9ce..7f37026cfbe 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/docs/18_support/howto.html +++ b/libstdc++-v3/docs/18_support/howto.html @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ libstdc++-v3 HOWTO: Chapter 18 - + @@ -89,6 +89,18 @@ foo(0); instead of foo(NULL);, then you're back where you started.

+

Added Note: When we contacted Dr. Meyers to ask permission to + print this stuff, it prompted him to run this code through current + compilers to see what the state of the art is with respect to member + template functions. He posted + an + article to Usenet after discovering that the code above is not + valid! Even though it has no data members, it still needs a + user-defined constructor (which means that the class needs a type name + after all). The ctor can have an empty body; it just needs to be + there. (Stupid requirement? We think so too, and this will probably + be changed in the language itself.) +

Return to top of page or to the FAQ.

@@ -250,7 +262,7 @@ Comments and suggestions are welcome, and may be sent to Phil Edwards or Gabriel Dos Reis. -
$Id: howto.html,v 1.2 2000/07/07 21:13:28 pme Exp $ +
$Id: howto.html,v 1.3 2000/07/11 21:45:07 pme Exp $