c-decl.c (check_bitfield_type_and_width): Don't allow _Bool bit-fields wider than one bit.

* c-decl.c (check_bitfield_type_and_width): Don't allow _Bool
	bit-fields wider than one bit.

testsuite:
	* gcc.dg/c99-bool-2.c, gcc.dg/c99-bool-3.c: New tests.

From-SVN: r128634
This commit is contained in:
Joseph Myers 2007-09-20 23:15:07 +01:00 committed by Joseph Myers
parent 9fa6b0af1f
commit 02668aba7e
6 changed files with 57 additions and 18 deletions

View file

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2007-09-20 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
* c-decl.c (check_bitfield_type_and_width): Don't allow _Bool
bit-fields wider than one bit.
2007-09-20 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR debug/33316

View file

@ -3853,10 +3853,7 @@ check_bitfield_type_and_width (tree *type, tree *width, const char *orig_name)
&& type_mv != boolean_type_node)
pedwarn ("type of bit-field %qs is a GCC extension", name);
if (type_mv == boolean_type_node)
max_width = CHAR_TYPE_SIZE;
else
max_width = TYPE_PRECISION (*type);
max_width = TYPE_PRECISION (*type);
if (0 < compare_tree_int (*width, max_width))
{

View file

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
2007-09-20 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
* gcc.dg/c99-bool-2.c, gcc.dg/c99-bool-3.c: New tests.
2007-09-20 Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/33221

View file

@ -32,8 +32,6 @@ int c = __bool_true_false_are_defined;
struct foo
{
_Bool a : 1;
_Bool b : 2;
_Bool c : 7;
} sf;
#define str(x) xstr(x)
@ -242,21 +240,9 @@ main (void)
sf.a = 1;
if (sf.a != 1)
abort ();
sf.b = 1;
if (sf.b != 1)
abort ();
sf.c = 1;
if (sf.c != 1)
abort ();
sf.a = 0;
if (sf.a != 0)
abort ();
sf.b = 0;
if (sf.b != 0)
abort ();
sf.c = 0;
if (sf.c != 0)
abort ();
}
exit (0);
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
/* Test for _Bool bit-fields. After TC2, the width of a _Bool
bit-field must not extend the width (number of sign and value bits)
of _Bool, which is implementation-defined but is 1 unless the
implementation defines representations for values greater than 1 in
type _Bool and allows for _Bool objects to have such types, which
GCC does not. */
/* Origin: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> */
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-std=iso9899:1999 -pedantic-errors" } */
struct foo
{
_Bool b : 2; /* { dg-error "width" } */
};

View file

@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
/* Test for _Bool bit-fields. They have the semantics of _Bool, at
least for now (DR#335 Spring 2007 discussion). */
/* Origin: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> */
/* { dg-do run } */
/* { dg-options "-std=iso9899:1999 -pedantic-errors" } */
struct foo
{
_Bool a : 1;
} sf;
extern void abort (void);
extern void exit (int);
int
main (void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < sizeof (struct foo); i++)
*((unsigned char *)&sf + i) = (unsigned char) -1;
sf.a = 2;
if (sf.a != 1)
abort ();
sf.a = 0;
if (sf.a != 0)
abort ();
sf.a = 0.2;
if (sf.a != 1)
abort ();
sf.a = &sf;
if (sf.a != 1)
abort ();
exit (0);
}