A better solution for bug#29347
* src/thread.c (really_call_select): Don't try to take the global lock if the same thread is already holding it. (Bug#29347)
This commit is contained in:
parent
86e6ed8521
commit
f7fdaea4c0
1 changed files with 10 additions and 8 deletions
18
src/thread.c
18
src/thread.c
|
@ -97,12 +97,7 @@ post_acquire_global_lock (struct thread_state *self)
|
|||
static void
|
||||
acquire_global_lock (struct thread_state *self)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* If some Lisp was interrupted by C-g while inside pselect, the
|
||||
signal handler could have called maybe_reacquire_global_lock, in
|
||||
which case we are already holding the lock and shouldn't try
|
||||
taking it again, or else we will hang forever. */
|
||||
if (!(self && !self->not_holding_lock))
|
||||
sys_mutex_lock (&global_lock);
|
||||
sys_mutex_lock (&global_lock);
|
||||
post_acquire_global_lock (self);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -578,8 +573,15 @@ really_call_select (void *arg)
|
|||
sa->timeout, sa->sigmask);
|
||||
|
||||
block_interrupt_signal (&oldset);
|
||||
acquire_global_lock (self);
|
||||
self->not_holding_lock = 0;
|
||||
/* If we were interrupted by C-g while inside sa->func above, the
|
||||
signal handler could have called maybe_reacquire_global_lock, in
|
||||
which case we are already holding the lock and shouldn't try
|
||||
taking it again, or else we will hang forever. */
|
||||
if (self->not_holding_lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
acquire_global_lock (self);
|
||||
self->not_holding_lock = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
restore_signal_mask (&oldset);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue