; Improve wording in documentation of 'not and 'null'
* doc/lispref/control.texi (Combining Conditions): * doc/lispref/lists.texi (List-related Predicates): Clarify wording of 'not' vs 'null'. (Bug#70392)
This commit is contained in:
parent
5971aa1fd3
commit
ecb80e0e8a
2 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -349,7 +349,8 @@ kinds of multiple conditional constructs.
|
|||
This function tests for the falsehood of @var{condition}. It returns
|
||||
@code{t} if @var{condition} is @code{nil}, and @code{nil} otherwise.
|
||||
The function @code{not} is identical to @code{null}, and we recommend
|
||||
using the name @code{null} if you are testing for an empty list.
|
||||
using the name @code{null} if you are testing for an empty list or
|
||||
@code{nil} value.
|
||||
@end defun
|
||||
|
||||
@defspec and conditions@dots{}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -143,9 +143,9 @@ This function is the opposite of @code{listp}: it returns @code{t} if
|
|||
@defun null object
|
||||
This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is @code{nil}, and
|
||||
returns @code{nil} otherwise. This function is identical to @code{not},
|
||||
but as a matter of clarity we use @code{null} when @var{object} is
|
||||
considered a list and @code{not} when it is considered a truth value
|
||||
(see @code{not} in @ref{Combining Conditions}).
|
||||
but as a matter of clarity we use @code{not} when @var{object} is
|
||||
considered a truth value (see @code{not} in @ref{Combining
|
||||
Conditions}) and @code{null} otherwise.
|
||||
|
||||
@example
|
||||
@group
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue