; * etc/NEWS: Fix typos.

This commit is contained in:
Michael Albinus 2023-02-13 16:44:57 +01:00
parent 909bd04cf5
commit dd8b720ee7

View file

@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ documented from day one; it just didn't behave according to
documentation. It turns out some Lisp programs were using this
coding-system on the wrong assumption that the "auto" part means some
automagic handling of the end-of-line (EOL) format conversion; those
program will now start to fail, because BOM signature in UTF-8 encoded
programs will now start to fail, because BOM signature in UTF-8 encoded
text is rarely expected. That is the reason we mention this bugfix
here.
@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ and the major mode with 'M-x so-long-mode', or visit the file with
In buffers in which these display optimizations are in effect, the
'fontification-functions', 'pre-command-hook' and 'post-command-hook'
hooks are executed on a narrowed portion of the buffer, whose size is
controlled by the options 'long-line-optimizations-region-size' and
controlled by the variables 'long-line-optimizations-region-size' and
'long-line-optimizations-bol-search-limit', as if they were in a
'with-narrowing' form. This may, in particular, cause occasional
mis-fontifications in these buffers.