procyberian/emacs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

; Explain why "kinds of atom" isn't a typo

Browse source 
* doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi (Lisp Atoms): Add a comment
explaining why "kinds of atom" isn't a typo.
This commit is contained in:
Eli Zaretskii 2021-10-27 14:33:42 +03:00
parent 47a3750162
commit d353fc4a00
1 changed files with 4 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
View file

@ -1162,6 +1162,10 @@ computer. Often, people use the term @dfn{expression}
indiscriminately. (Also, in many texts, the word @dfn{form} is used
as a synonym for expression.)
@c This and the next paragraph say ``kinds of atom'', but that is not
@c a typo, just slightly ``old-fashioned wording which adds a fillip
@c of interest to it'', and ``is more elegant writing'', according to
@c RMS.
Incidentally, the atoms that make up our universe were named such when
they were thought to be indivisible; but it has been found that physical
atoms are not indivisible. Parts can split off an atom or it can