procyberian/emacs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Fix recent change in lispref/processes.texi.

Browse source 
* doc/lispref/processes.texi (Asynchronous Processes): Clarify
wording.  Suggested by Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim@fitzsim.org>.
(Bug#33050)
This commit is contained in:
Eli Zaretskii 2018-10-27 21:47:59 +03:00
parent df64da8eb8
commit d192c1671c
1 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
doc/lispref/processes.texi
View file

@ -601,13 +601,13 @@ Shell mode, because they allow for job control (@kbd{C-c}, @kbd{C-z},
etc.)@: between the process and its children, and because interactive
programs treat ptys as terminal devices, whereas pipes don't support
these features. However, for subprocesses used by Lisp programs for
internal purposes (i.e., with no user interaction), where significant
amounts of data need to be exchanged between the subprocess and the
Lisp program, it is often better to use a pipe, because pipes are
more efficient, and because they are immune to stray character
injections that ptys introduce for large (around 500 byte) messages.
Also, the total number of ptys is limited on many systems, and it is
good not to waste them unnecessarily.
internal purposes (i.e., no user interaction with the subprocess is
required), where significant amounts of data need to be exchanged
between the subprocess and the Lisp program, it is often better to use
a pipe, because pipes are more efficient, and because they are immune
to stray character injections that ptys introduce for large (around
500 byte) messages. Also, the total number of ptys is limited on many
systems, and it is good not to waste them unnecessarily.
@defun make-process &rest args
This function is the basic low-level primitive for starting