Revert `open-line' electric-indent sensitivity

* lisp/simple.el (open-line): Remove electric indent code.
  (electric-indent-just-newline): Don't declare.

* test/automated/simple-test.el (open-line-indent): Adjust test.

This partly reverts Artur Malabarba's change that added electric
indent sensitivity to `open-line' (Oct 24 22:26:27 2015 +0100, git
commit bd4f04f86), and adjusts a new test he added right afterwards
(Sat Oct 24 23:43:06 2015 +0100, git commit 207f235e3) accordingly.
However, the new INTERACTIVE argument to `open-line', which he also
added in the first commit, is not reverted here.

See the thread "Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'." on the
Emacs Devel mailing list, and in particular this message:

  From: Artur Malabarba
  Subject: Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.
  To: Karl Fogel
  Cc: David Kastrup, Pierpaolo Bernardi, emacs-devel
  Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:03:58 +0000
  Message-ID: \
    <CAAdUY-KN06pvCMy5bt3+Buk3yeKjf6n9iB2FaSTTOPpCqPwyhA@mail.gmail.com>

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-11/msg01707.html

lisp/simple.el

@@ -458,15 +458,10 @@ A non-nil INTERACTIVE argument means to run the `post-self-insert-hook'."
 	(put-text-property from (point) 'rear-nonsticky
 			   (cons 'hard sticky)))))
 
-(declare-function electric-indent-just-newline "electric")
 (defun open-line (n &optional interactive)
   "Insert a newline and leave point before it.
-If `electric-indent-mode' is enabled, indent the new line if it's
-not empty.
 If there is a fill prefix and/or a `left-margin', insert them on
-the new line.  If the old line would have been blank, insert them
+the new line if the line would have been blank.
-on the old line as well.
-
 With arg N, insert N newlines.
 A non-nil INTERACTIVE argument means to run the `post-self-insert-hook'."
   (interactive "*p\np")
@@ -475,10 +470,7 @@ A non-nil INTERACTIVE argument means to run the `post-self-insert-hook'."
 	 (loc (point-marker))
          ;; Don't expand an abbrev before point.
 	 (abbrev-mode nil))
-    (if (and interactive
+    (newline n interactive)
-             (looking-at-p "[[:space:]]*$"))
-        (electric-indent-just-newline n)
-      (newline n interactive))
     (goto-char loc)
     (while (> n 0)
       (cond ((bolp)

test/automated/simple-test.el

@@ -138,6 +138,21 @@
                      (open-line 1)))
                  '("- - " . "\n(a b c d)"))))
 
+;; For a while, from 24 Oct - 19 Nov 2015, `open-line' in the Emacs
+;; development tree became sensitive to `electric-indent-mode', which
+;; it had not been before.  This sensitivity was reverted for the
+;; Emacs 25 release, so it could be discussed further (see thread
+;; "Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'." on the Emacs Devel
+;; mailing list).  The only test case here that started failing after
+;; the reversion is the third one, the one that currently expects
+;; `("(a b" . "\n   \n   c d)")'.  If `open-line' were again sensitive
+;; to electric indent, then the three spaces between the two newlines
+;; would go away, leaving `("(a b" . "\n\n   c d)")'.
+;;
+;; If electric indent sensitivity were re-enabled, we might also want
+;; to make the test cases below a bit stricter, or add some more test
+;; cases that are specific to `electric-indent-mode', since right now
+;; all but one of the cases pass with or without electric indent.
 (ert-deftest open-line-indent ()
   (should (equal (simple-test--dummy-buffer
                    (electric-indent-local-mode 1)