procyberian/emacs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Backport 2011-03-01T03:59:31Z!lekktu@gmail.com from trunk.

Browse source 
*lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el (lexical-let*): Fix argument name in docstring.
This commit is contained in:
Juanma Barranquero 2011-03-11 16:34:07 +01:00
parent 6dbf95e5b3
commit 9c5047fb4e
3 changed files with 6 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

3
lisp/ChangeLog
View file

@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
2011-03-11 Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>
Backport revno:103463 from trunk.
* emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el (lexical-let*): Fix argument name in docstring.
Backport revno:103622 from trunk.
* help-fns.el (describe-variable): Don't complete keywords.
Suggested by Teodor Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>.

4
lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-loaddefs.el
View file

@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ Not documented
;;;;;; flet progv psetq do-all-symbols do-symbols dotimes dolist
;;;;;; do* do loop return-from return block etypecase typecase ecase
;;;;;; case load-time-value eval-when destructuring-bind function*
;;;;;; defmacro* defun* gentemp gensym) "cl-macs" "cl-macs.el" "75e86ac663887b54bf1778f2dd028463")
;;;;;; defmacro* defun* gentemp gensym) "cl-macs" "cl-macs.el" "12451ac01f94f10d30cf7a8f92625c42")
;;; Generated autoloads from cl-macs.el
(autoload 'gensym "cl-macs" "\
@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ lexical closures as in Common Lisp.
(autoload 'lexical-let* "cl-macs" "\
Like `let*', but lexically scoped.
The main visible difference is that lambdas inside BODY, and in
successive bindings within BINDINGS, will create lexical closures
successive bindings within VARLIST, will create lexical closures
as in Common Lisp. This is similar to the behavior of `let*' in
Common Lisp.

2
lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
View file

@ -1455,7 +1455,7 @@ lexical closures as in Common Lisp.
(defmacro lexical-let* (bindings &rest body)
"Like `let*', but lexically scoped.
The main visible difference is that lambdas inside BODY, and in
successive bindings within BINDINGS, will create lexical closures
successive bindings within VARLIST, will create lexical closures
as in Common Lisp. This is similar to the behavior of `let*' in
Common Lisp.
\n(fn VARLIST BODY)"