Improve documentation of Edebug and macros
* doc/lispref/edebug.texi (Instrumenting Macro Calls): Improve discussion of when it might be necessary to find and evaluate macro specifications before instrumenting. (Specification List): Clarify what "defining form" means to Edebug and when 'def-form' or 'def-body' should be used instead of 'form' or 'body'.
This commit is contained in:
parent
79108894db
commit
93304e3115
1 changed files with 22 additions and 10 deletions
|
@ -1144,9 +1144,12 @@ the @code{declare} form.
|
|||
@c automatically load the entire source file containing the function
|
||||
@c being instrumented. That would avoid this.
|
||||
Take care to ensure that the specifications are known to Edebug when
|
||||
you instrument code. If you are instrumenting a function from a file
|
||||
that uses @code{eval-when-compile} to require another file containing
|
||||
macro definitions, you may need to explicitly load that file.
|
||||
you instrument code. If you are instrumenting a function which uses a
|
||||
macro defined in another file, you may first need to either evaluate
|
||||
the @code{require} forms in the file containing your function, or
|
||||
explicitly load the file containing the macro. If the definition of a
|
||||
macro is wrapped by @code{eval-when-compile}, you may need to evaluate
|
||||
it.
|
||||
|
||||
You can also define an edebug specification for a macro separately
|
||||
from the macro definition with @code{def-edebug-spec}. Adding
|
||||
|
@ -1231,13 +1234,17 @@ A single unevaluated Lisp object, which is not instrumented.
|
|||
@c an "expression" is not necessarily intended for evaluation.
|
||||
|
||||
@item form
|
||||
A single evaluated expression, which is instrumented.
|
||||
A single evaluated expression, which is instrumented. If your macro
|
||||
wraps the expression with @code{lambda} before it is evaluated, use
|
||||
@code{def-form} instead. See @code{def-form} below.
|
||||
|
||||
@item place
|
||||
A generalized variable. @xref{Generalized Variables}.
|
||||
|
||||
@item body
|
||||
Short for @code{&rest form}. See @code{&rest} below.
|
||||
Short for @code{&rest form}. See @code{&rest} below. If your macro
|
||||
wraps its body of code with @code{lambda} before it is evaluated, use
|
||||
@code{def-body} instead. See @code{def-body} below.
|
||||
|
||||
@item function-form
|
||||
A function form: either a quoted function symbol, a quoted lambda
|
||||
|
@ -1292,11 +1299,16 @@ succeeds.
|
|||
|
||||
@item &define
|
||||
@c @kindex &define @r{(Edebug)}
|
||||
Indicates that the specification is for a defining form. The defining
|
||||
form itself is not instrumented (that is, Edebug does not stop before and
|
||||
after the defining form), but forms inside it typically will be
|
||||
instrumented. The @code{&define} keyword should be the first element in
|
||||
a list specification.
|
||||
|
||||
Indicates that the specification is for a defining form. Edebug's
|
||||
definition of a defining form is a form containing one or more code
|
||||
forms which are saved and executed later, after the execution of the
|
||||
defining form.
|
||||
|
||||
The defining form itself is not instrumented (that is, Edebug does not
|
||||
stop before and after the defining form), but forms inside it
|
||||
typically will be instrumented. The @code{&define} keyword should be
|
||||
the first element in a list specification.
|
||||
|
||||
@item nil
|
||||
This is successful when there are no more arguments to match at the
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue