procyberian/emacs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

; Fix node name in emacs-lisp-intro.texi

Browse source 
* doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
(Lexical vs Dynamic Binding Example): Renamed from "... vs. ...",
to avoid using period in node names.
This commit is contained in:
Eli Zaretskii 2024-12-22 12:11:46 +02:00
parent 77243ba5be
commit 861b7864fc
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
View file

@ -3774,7 +3774,7 @@ elisp, The Emacs Lisp Reference Manual}.
@menu @menu
* Lexical & Dynamic Binding Differences:: * Lexical & Dynamic Binding Differences::
* Lexical vs. Dynamic Binding Example:: * Lexical vs Dynamic Binding Example::
@end menu @end menu
@node Lexical & Dynamic Binding Differences @node Lexical & Dynamic Binding Differences
@ -3811,7 +3811,7 @@ on the top of the stack, and then executes the @code{let} body. Once
the @code{let} body finishes, it takes that binding off of the stack, the @code{let} body finishes, it takes that binding off of the stack,
revealing the one it had (if any) before the @code{let} expression. revealing the one it had (if any) before the @code{let} expression.
@node Lexical vs. Dynamic Binding Example @node Lexical vs Dynamic Binding Example
@unnumberedsubsubsec Example of Lexical vs. Dynamic Binding @unnumberedsubsubsec Example of Lexical vs. Dynamic Binding
In some cases, both lexical and dynamic binding behave identically. In some cases, both lexical and dynamic binding behave identically.
However, in other cases, they can change the meaning of your program. However, in other cases, they can change the meaning of your program.