cl-macs.el: Fix minor merge snafu (bug#77348)

* lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el (cl-flet, cl-labels): Recover the changes
made in commit 4764261681 and accidentally undone by a later merge of
commit 63adf9dcf5.
This commit is contained in:
Stefan Monnier 2025-04-02 15:05:02 -04:00
parent df82855aeb
commit 7cffcbb513

View file

@ -2072,7 +2072,8 @@ a `let' form, except that the list of symbols can be computed at run-time."
Each definition can take the form (FUNC EXP) where FUNC is the function
name, and EXP is an expression that returns the function value to which
it should be bound, or it can take the more common form (FUNC ARGLIST
BODY...) which is a shorthand for (FUNC (lambda ARGLIST BODY)).
BODY...) which is a shorthand for (FUNC (lambda ARGLIST BODY))
where BODY is wrapped in a `cl-block' named FUNC.
FUNC is defined only within FORM, not BODY, so you can't write recursive
function definitions. Use `cl-labels' for that. See Info node
@ -2279,11 +2280,14 @@ Like `cl-flet' but the definitions can refer to previous ones.
Each definition can take the form (FUNC EXP) where FUNC is the function
name, and EXP is an expression that returns the function value to which
it should be bound, or it can take the more common form (FUNC ARGLIST
BODY...) which is a shorthand for (FUNC (lambda ARGLIST BODY)).
BODY...) which is a shorthand for (FUNC (lambda ARGLIST BODY))
where BODY is wrapped in a `cl-block' named FUNC.
FUNC is defined in any BODY, as well as FORM, so you can write recursive
and mutually recursive function definitions. See Info node
`(cl) Function Bindings' for details.
FUNC is in scope in any BODY or EXP, as well as in FORM, so you can write
recursive and mutually recursive function definitions, with the caveat
that EXPs are evaluated in sequence and you cannot call a FUNC before its
EXP has been evaluated.
See Info node `(cl) Function Bindings' for details.
\(fn ((FUNC ARGLIST BODY...) ...) FORM...)"
(declare (indent 1) (debug cl-flet))