procyberian/emacs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Fix subr-x-tests when running from elc

Browse source 
* test/lisp/emacs-lisp/subr-x-tests.el (subr-x-and-let*-test-group-1):
Use `eval' around the `should-error' cases.
This commit is contained in:
Noam Postavsky 2017-09-25 07:15:51 -04:00
parent 66d35ae49d
commit 79162cb0db
1 changed files with 7 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

9
test/lisp/emacs-lisp/subr-x-tests.el
View file

@ -397,9 +397,14 @@
(should (equal 1 (let ((x 1)) (and-let* (x)))))
(should (equal nil (and-let* ((x nil)))))
(should (equal 1 (and-let* ((x 1)))))
(should-error (and-let* (nil (x 1))) :type 'setting-constant)
;; The error doesn't trigger when compiled: the compiler will give
;; a warning and then drop the erroneous code. Therefore, use
;; `eval' to avoid compilation.
(should-error (eval '(and-let* (nil (x 1))) lexical-binding)
:type 'setting-constant)
(should (equal nil (and-let* ((nil) (x 1)))))
(should-error (and-let* (2 (x 1))) :type 'wrong-type-argument)
(should-error (eval (and-let* (2 (x 1))) lexical-binding)
:type 'wrong-type-argument)
(should (equal 1 (and-let* ((2) (x 1)))))
(should (equal 2 (and-let* ((x 1) (2)))))
(should (equal nil (let ((x nil)) (and-let* (x) x))))