Amend byte-run-strip-symbol-positions so that an unexec build builds

This fixes bug #54098.

* lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-run.el (byte-run--strip-list)
(byte-run--strip-vector/record): New functions.  These alter a list or
vector/record structure only where a symbol with position gets replaced by a
bare symbol.
(byte-run-strip-symbol-positions): Reformulate to use the two new functions.
(function-put): No longer strip positions from the second and third arguments.

* lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el (byte-compile-out): Remove the senseless
"stripping" of putative symbol positions from OPERAND, which is nil or a
number.
This commit is contained in:
Alan Mackenzie 2022-02-24 17:30:39 +00:00
parent 2db149539b
commit 6092ee1c3f
2 changed files with 58 additions and 45 deletions

View file

@ -5099,7 +5099,7 @@ binding slots have been popped."
OP and OPERAND are as passed to `byte-compile-out'."
(if (memq op '(byte-call byte-discardN byte-discardN-preserve-tos))
;; For calls, OPERAND is the number of args, so we pop OPERAND + 1
;; elements, and the push the result, for a total of -OPERAND.
;; elements, and then push the result, for a total of -OPERAND.
;; For discardN*, of course, we just pop OPERAND elements.
(- operand)
(or (aref byte-stack+-info (symbol-value op))
@ -5109,7 +5109,6 @@ OP and OPERAND are as passed to `byte-compile-out'."
(- 1 operand))))
(defun byte-compile-out (op &optional operand)
(setq operand (byte-run-strip-symbol-positions operand))
(push (cons op operand) byte-compile-output)
(if (eq op 'byte-return)
;; This is actually an unnecessary case, because there should be no