Firm up documentation of generalized variables
* doc/lispref/variables.texi (Generalized Variables) (Setting Generalized Variables): Define a generalized variable as something setf can write to. Remove the insinuation that hackers have poor memories. State explicitly that the list of GVs given is complete. Remove the suggestion that `setf' has superseded, or is in the process of superseding, `setq'. Make minor corrections to the English.
This commit is contained in:
parent
a5bf099008
commit
4ab4551470
1 changed files with 18 additions and 16 deletions
|
@ -2317,11 +2317,12 @@ Attempting to assign them any other value will result in an error:
|
|||
|
||||
@cindex generalized variable
|
||||
@cindex place form
|
||||
A @dfn{generalized variable} or @dfn{place form} is one of the many places
|
||||
in Lisp memory where values can be stored. The simplest place form is
|
||||
a regular Lisp variable. But the @sc{car}s and @sc{cdr}s of lists, elements
|
||||
of arrays, properties of symbols, and many other locations are also
|
||||
places where Lisp values are stored.
|
||||
A @dfn{generalized variable} or @dfn{place form} is one of the many
|
||||
places in Lisp memory where values can be stored using the @code{setf}
|
||||
macro (@pxref{Setting Generalized Variables}). The simplest place
|
||||
form is a regular Lisp variable. But the @sc{car}s and @sc{cdr}s of
|
||||
lists, elements of arrays, properties of symbols, and many other
|
||||
locations are also places where Lisp values get stored.
|
||||
|
||||
Generalized variables are analogous to lvalues in the C
|
||||
language, where @samp{x = a[i]} gets an element from an array
|
||||
|
@ -2342,8 +2343,8 @@ variables. The @code{setf} form is like @code{setq}, except that it
|
|||
accepts arbitrary place forms on the left side rather than just
|
||||
symbols. For example, @code{(setf (car a) b)} sets the car of
|
||||
@code{a} to @code{b}, doing the same operation as @code{(setcar a b)},
|
||||
but without having to remember two separate functions for setting and
|
||||
accessing every type of place.
|
||||
but without you having to use two separate functions for setting and
|
||||
accessing this type of place.
|
||||
|
||||
@defmac setf [place form]@dots{}
|
||||
This macro evaluates @var{form} and stores it in @var{place}, which
|
||||
|
@ -2353,18 +2354,19 @@ just as with @code{setq}. @code{setf} returns the value of the last
|
|||
@var{form}.
|
||||
@end defmac
|
||||
|
||||
The following Lisp forms will work as generalized variables, and
|
||||
so may appear in the @var{place} argument of @code{setf}:
|
||||
The following Lisp forms are the forms in Emacs that will work as
|
||||
generalized variables, and so may appear in the @var{place} argument
|
||||
of @code{setf}:
|
||||
|
||||
@itemize
|
||||
@item
|
||||
A symbol naming a variable. In other words, @code{(setf x y)} is
|
||||
exactly equivalent to @code{(setq x y)}, and @code{setq} itself is
|
||||
strictly speaking redundant given that @code{setf} exists. Many
|
||||
programmers continue to prefer @code{setq} for setting simple
|
||||
variables, though, purely for stylistic or historical reasons.
|
||||
The macro @code{(setf x y)} actually expands to @code{(setq x y)},
|
||||
so there is no performance penalty for using it in compiled code.
|
||||
A symbol. In other words, @code{(setf x y)} is exactly equivalent to
|
||||
@code{(setq x y)}, and @code{setq} itself is strictly speaking
|
||||
redundant given that @code{setf} exists. Most programmers will
|
||||
continue to prefer @code{setq} for setting simple variables, though,
|
||||
for stylistic and historical reasons. The macro @code{(setf x y)}
|
||||
actually expands to @code{(setq x y)}, so there is no performance
|
||||
penalty for using it in compiled code.
|
||||
|
||||
@item
|
||||
A call to any of the following standard Lisp functions:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue