Remove mention of old dotted-list reader quirk from manual
* doc/lispref/objects.texi (Dotted Pair Notation): The (. X) reader peculiarity is no more (bug#62020).
This commit is contained in:
parent
42335c2c1f
commit
3ce37db988
1 changed files with 0 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -1007,13 +1007,6 @@ It looks like this:
|
||||||
@end example
|
@end example
|
||||||
@end ifnottex
|
@end ifnottex
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As a somewhat peculiar side effect of @code{(a b . c)} and
|
|
||||||
@code{(a . (b . c))} being equivalent, for consistency this means
|
|
||||||
that if you replace @code{b} here with the empty sequence, then it
|
|
||||||
follows that @code{(a . c)} and @code{(a . ( . c))} are equivalent,
|
|
||||||
too. This also means that @code{( . c)} is equivalent to @code{c},
|
|
||||||
but this is seldom used.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@node Association List Type
|
@node Association List Type
|
||||||
@subsubsection Association List Type
|
@subsubsection Association List Type
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue