procyberian/emacs
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Send text received by bracketed paste to process

Browse source 
See Bug#24639.

* term.el (term--xterm-paste): New function.
(term-raw-map): Use it.
(xterm--pasted-text): Declare function from xterm.el.
This commit is contained in:
Philipp Stephani 2016-11-06 19:21:10 +01:00
parent db0b58da1d
commit 26c3554f88
1 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
lisp/term.el
View file

@ -845,6 +845,7 @@ is buffer-local."
(define-key map [S-insert] 'term-paste) (define-key map [S-insert] 'term-paste)
(define-key map [prior] 'term-send-prior) (define-key map [prior] 'term-send-prior)
(define-key map [next] 'term-send-next) (define-key map [next] 'term-send-next)
(define-key map [xterm-paste] #'term--xterm-paste)
map) map)
"Keyboard map for sending characters directly to the inferior process.") "Keyboard map for sending characters directly to the inferior process.")
@ -1211,6 +1212,13 @@ without any interpretation."
(interactive) (interactive)
(term-send-raw-string (current-kill 0))) (term-send-raw-string (current-kill 0)))
(defun term--xterm-paste ()
"Insert the text pasted in an XTerm bracketed paste operation."
(interactive)
(term-send-raw-string (xterm--pasted-text)))
(declare-function xterm--pasted-text "term/xterm" ())
;; Which would be better: "\e[A" or "\eOA"? readline accepts either. ;; Which would be better: "\e[A" or "\eOA"? readline accepts either.
;; For my configuration it's definitely better \eOA but YMMV. -mm ;; For my configuration it's definitely better \eOA but YMMV. -mm
;; For example: vi works with \eOA while elm wants \e[A ... ;; For example: vi works with \eOA while elm wants \e[A ...