Remove the file.

etc/LEDIT

@@ -1,77 +0,0 @@
-Date: 17 Apr 85 15:45:42 EST (Wed)
-From: Martin David Connor <mdc@MIT-HTVAX.ARPA>
-
-    Date: Sat, 13 Apr 85 16:28:15 est
-    From: Richard M. Stallman <rms@mit-prep>
-
-    Can you help this person?  Also, can you give me the rest of ledit
-    to distribute, plus some info on how to use it?
-
-I have put the files "ledit.l" and "leditcfns.c" on prep:~mdc.
-Much to my disgust ledit.l relied on some bogus little package of
-functions on HT, so I had to massage it a bit.
-
-To get it to work, one must:
-
-   - Compile leditcfns.c with something like:
-
-     cc leditcfns.c
-
-   - Edit ledit.l, changing the line beginning "(cfasl" to
-     have the right pathname for the cfns file you compiled in
-     the last step.
-
-   - Compile ledit.l with:
-
-     liszt ledit.l
-
-Then put the following lines in your .lisprc file:
-
-    ;load in functions for emacs interface
-    (load "//src//mdc//ledit//ledit")   ; Location of Ledit library
-    (set-proc-str "%gnumacs")		; Name of editor
-
-Then you can use ^E <RETURN> to get from LISP back to gnumacs.
-
-Here is the part of my .emacs file that pertains to ledit.
-
-    ;;; Set up ledit mode
-    (setq ledit-go-to-lisp-string "%lisp")
-    (setq lisp-mode-hook 'ledit-from-lisp-mode)
-
-    Date: Sat, 13 Apr 85 11:26:32 cst
-    From: neves@wisc-ai.arpa (David Neves)
-
-    This is a documentation question.
-    I cannot figure out how to use Ledit.  I suspect I need some
-    function on the Franz Lisp end of things to go to Emacs and read in
-    the temporary file.  Is this true?  Is the Lisp job started within
-    Emacs or outside of emacs?  I'm just plain confused.  Perhaps a couple
-    of words from someone in the know would help.
-
-    A related question.  I have been using a shell buffer when interacting
-    with Lisp (ie. put a definition in the kill buffer and then yank it
-    into the shell buffer to redefine it).  This is nice but tends to fill
-    up the shell buffer with lots of code (I'd rather keep calls to functions
-    in the shell and not the functions themselves).
-    My question:  Is using the shell buffer "better" than ledit?  Am I using
-    it in the best way (i.e. copying definitions from an edit buffer to the
-    shell buffer)?    -Thanks, David Neves
-
-I have found that ledit works well for doing programming development
-when you are changing lots of little pieces of a file and don't wish
-to recompile the whole file.  Of course M-X Compile is very nice for
-calling up a liszt on a buffer and watching it in the another window.
-Of course the interface of something like NIL is even better because
-you can compile your function directly into your lisp.  But since NIL
-doesn't run under Unix, this is probably the next best thing.
-
-I have tried the 2 window method (shell in lower window, lisp code in
-upper), and have found it a little awkward.  It does have certain
-advantages, but most of the time, I get be fine using M-C-D to save a
-defun for lisp, and C-X Z to jump back to LISP.  C-E RETURN from lisp
-is also mnemonic for getting back to gnumacs.
-
-I hope this helps somewhat.
-
-

lib-src/leditcfns.c

@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
-#include <sgtty.h>
-#include <signal.h>
-#define STRLEN 100
-static char str[STRLEN+1] = "%?emacs"; /* extra char for the null */
-
-switch_to_proc(){
-    char *ptr = str;
-    while (*ptr) ioctl(0, TIOCSTI, ptr++);
-    ioctl(0, TIOCSTI, "\n");
-    kill(getpid(), SIGTSTP);
-    }
-
-set_proc_str(ptr) char *ptr; {
-    if (strlen(ptr) <= STRLEN)
-	strcpy(str, ptr);
-    else
-	printf("string too long for set-proc-str: %s\n", ptr);
-    }
-
-/* arch-tag: eb7ae804-0d6e-4077-ab42-7173821410c3
-   (do not change this comment) */